Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Bankruptsy jumps 40 percent 2007
          
   
   

Results 1 to 14 of 14

Threaded View

  1. #1
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    Bankruptcy jumps 40 percent 2007

     



    Personal Bankruptcy Filings Rise 40% - washingtonpost.com
    Bankruptcies likely to rise again in 2008 -- analysts - MarketWatch


    Here is little article that was aquired from the net....



    Going Bankrupt


    Why the Debt Crisis Is Now the Greatest Threat to the American Republic


    Tomgram: Chalmers Johnson, How to Sink America...


    By Chalmers Johnson


    The military adventurers of the Bush administration
    have much in common with the corporate leaders of the defunct energy
    company Enron. Both groups of men thought that they were the "smartest
    guys in the room," the title of Alex Gibney's prize-winning film
    <http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0413845/> on what went wrong at Enron.
    The neoconservatives in the White House and the Pentagon outsmarted
    themselves. They failed even to address the problem of how to finance
    their schemes of imperialist wars and global domination.


    As a result, going into 2008, the United States finds itself
    in the anomalous position of being unable to pay for its own elevated
    living standards or its wasteful, overly large military establishment.
    Its government no longer even attempts to reduce the ruinous expenses
    of maintaining huge standing armies, replacing the equipment that
    seven years of wars have destroyed or worn out
    <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/04/AR200...>
    , or preparing for a war
    <http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10533205> in
    outer space <http://www.afspc.af.mil/> against unknown adversaries.
    Instead, the Bush administration puts off these costs for future
    generations to pay -- or repudiate. This utter fiscal irresponsibility
    has been disguised through many manipulative financial schemes (such
    as causing poorer countries to lend us unprecedented sums of money),
    but the time of reckoning is fast approaching.


    There are three broad aspects to our debt crisis. First, in
    the current fiscal year (2008) we are spending insane amounts of money
    on "defense" projects that bear no relationship to the national
    security of the United States. Simultaneously, we are keeping the
    income tax burdens on the richest segments of the American population
    at strikingly low levels.


    Second, we continue to believe that we can compensate for the
    accelerating erosion of our manufacturing base and our loss of jobs to
    foreign countries through massive military expenditures -- so-called
    "military Keynesianism," which I discuss in detail in my book Nemesis:
    The Last Days of the American Republic
    <http://www.amazon.com/dp/0805087281/ref=nosim/?tag=nationbooks08-20>
    . By military Keynesianism, I mean the mistaken belief that public
    policies focused on frequent wars, huge expenditures on weapons and
    munitions, and large standing armies can indefinitely sustain a
    wealthy capitalist economy. The opposite is actually true.


    Third, in our devotion to militarism (despite our limited
    resources), we are failing to invest in our social infrastructure and
    other requirements for the long-term health of our country. These are
    what economists call "opportunity costs," things not done because we
    spent our money on something else. Our public education system has
    deteriorated alarmingly. We have failed to provide health care to all
    our citizens and neglected our responsibilities as the world's number
    one polluter. Most important, we have lost our competitiveness as a
    manufacturer for civilian needs -- an infinitely more efficient use of
    scarce resources than arms manufacturing. Let me discuss each of
    these.


    The Current Fiscal Disaster


    It is virtually impossible to overstate the profligacy of what
    our government spends on the military. The Department of Defense's
    planned expenditures for fiscal year 2008 are larger than all other
    nations' military budgets combined. The supplementary budget to pay
    for the current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, not part of the official
    defense budget, is itself larger than the combined military budgets of
    Russia and China. Defense-related spending for fiscal 2008 will exceed
    $1 trillion for the first time in history. The United States has
    become the largest single salesman of arms and munitions to other
    nations on Earth. Leaving out of account President Bush's two on-going
    wars, defense spending has doubled since the mid-1990s. The defense
    budget for fiscal 2008 is the largest since World War II.


    Before we try to break down and analyze this gargantuan sum,
    there is one important caveat. Figures on defense spending are
    notoriously unreliable. The numbers released by the Congressional
    Reference Service and the Congressional Budget Office do not agree
    with each other. Robert Higgs, senior fellow for political economy at
    the Independent Institute, says
    <http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1941> : "A
    well-founded rule of thumb is to take the Pentagon's (always well
    publicized) basic budget total and double it." Even a cursory reading
    of newspaper articles about the Department of Defense will turn up
    major differences in statistics about its expenses. Some 30-40% of the
    defense budget is "black," meaning that these sections contain hidden
    expenditures for classified projects. There is no possible way to know
    what they include or whether their total amounts are accurate.
    Last edited by shawnlee28; 02-12-2008 at 11:45 AM.
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink