Thread: What's up with this?????
-
11-17-2007 09:22 PM #16
hey i am liking that henry thats slick
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
11-18-2007 06:23 AM #17
Dave,It is called an SB2.
Originally Posted by Dave Severson
-
11-18-2007 07:14 AM #18
Actually it's an RO7, http://www.usatoday.com/sports/motor...y-engine_N.htmYour Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon
It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.
Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.
-
11-18-2007 07:23 AM #19
Well,Bob they are a little early.
Originally Posted by Bob Parmenter
I did'nt think they where supose to start until after Christmas.
-
11-18-2007 07:29 AM #20
It should be called NAECAR instead of NASCAR . . . "E" for experimental.The new, computer-designed model with a maximum 358-cubic-inch displacement won't be put into general production, according to Jim Covey, engine technical director for General Motors Racing, but principles proven on the track will lead to everyday advancements.Jack
Gone to Texas
-
11-18-2007 07:48 AM #21
I suspect some of them wanted to get a leg up on actual race reliability for Daytona purposes. Saying that, I don't get Gibbs spending any time on this at all with their switch to Toyota for next year. Unless there's some awful similar design/technology??
Originally Posted by erik erikson
Or it could be they have some contractural developement thing with GM that they had to fulfill before year end.
Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon
It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.
Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.
-
11-18-2007 07:50 AM #22
Ya mean like a Tarantula? For some reason that has a familiar ring to it....
Originally Posted by DennyW
Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong!
-
11-18-2007 08:09 AM #23
I personally feel its time for the American manufacturers to lead by eliminating the entire mechanical valve train. They need to get going on electronic valve timing, eliminate the cam, timing chain, distributor, coil, wires, lifters, pushrods and rocker mechanism and go with computer controlled electrical solenoids. Talk about your variable valve timing! Plug in the computer and tune it the way you want. It would also make the engine lighter and eliminate all that heat generated from friction in the existing setups.
-
11-18-2007 12:00 PM #24
v-tec for hot rods are you smoking something good?
-
11-18-2007 05:14 PM #25
What v-tec is camless?
-
11-18-2007 06:11 PM #26
The technology is certainly there... and the tune-up potential would be mind boggling!!!! Changing cams with a lap top!!!!
Originally Posted by Corvette64
As for NASCAR, I doubt they'll ever even lose the carb or allow OHC engines to run. I guess personally I'd like to see them lower the minimum weight, do away with the dinosaur suspension, lower the cubes to 5 liter's and let some of the new technology in engines into the game.... But then they don't call me too often for my opinion... But then if I had my way, Indy cars would still be front engine roadsters!!!!!!
Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
11-18-2007 06:13 PM #27
Originally Posted by Henry Rifle
Friend of mine runs that setup on his road racing type small block!!!! Think the car itself is an old Lola or something like that. Vintage type car, really kewl!!!Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!





LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

I'm happy to see it back up, sure hope it lasts.
Back online