Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 289 c6ae heads Vs 1990 5.0 stock heads
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 17

Threaded View

  1. #6
    Was_II's Avatar
    Was_II is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1978 Mustang II
    Posts
    133

    I have to concur with ricebasher. I run '66 289 heads on a 306 (.30 over 302) and it's got serious balls.

    I don't know the exact specs on the heads and I'd be eager to know; I've been told that it's a free-breathing, high-compression head. What I DO know is that the response is killer and the torque shakes the whole car. I'm sure it won't stand up to a set of Trickflows, but I'm told it's as good as you'll get with cast-iron.

    My suggestion is to try them both; swapping heads on a 302 is only an afternoon's work, and just costs you a set of gaskets.

    And if you find that the 5.0 heads are more to your liking, PM me and I'll take those 289's off your hands. Seriously.
    Last edited by Was_II; 12-28-2004 at 09:08 PM.
    Dual Quad Tunnel Rammed "Are you INSANE?" 5.0L H.O. '78 Mustang II

    http://www.cardomain.com/ride/803178

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink