Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 351W build
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    For a moderate horse cruizer, the stock components in the bottom end will do just fine. As for the dual point, used to go fast running them, if you have it and it's in good shape might as well use it! Can always update it some other time.

    I see the heads are from a '71....might be a good head, at least they would be pre-smog. However, it doesn't take a lot of work to wrap up a bunch of money in a low performance head, IMO the AFR's are an excellent choice! Should you decide at a later date to upgrade the performance you'll already have the good heads. Heads and cam are so important to getting good performance from any engine.

    Comp is a good cam company, before you choose a cam I would suggest downloading their Cam Quest 6 program (freebie), then input the rest of the data from your car and see what comes up on for a cam choice. When in doubt, call one of the Comp Techs and talk over the choice with him. To get the most for you money, selecting a cam based on it's performance rather then any sort of poser value is critical....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  2. #2
    BigBowe is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    4

    Thanks again for the feedback. The dual point seems to be in good shape. The shaft is tight, gear looks good. I thought I found a place that sells points for it, so might try it. There is no vacuum advance on it...
    Thanks for the advice on the comp software, I will give it a try. I've never run a comp cam, but they sure have a ton of choices.

    Anyone ever try the Comp Thumper cams? Looks like they close up the center line to about 107 to give them a lope. Just wondering if these cams actually perform well or is it mostly a gimmick?

  3. #3
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by BigBowe View Post
    Thanks again for the feedback. The dual point seems to be in good shape. The shaft is tight, gear looks good. I thought I found a place that sells points for it, so might try it. There is no vacuum advance on it...
    Thanks for the advice on the comp software, I will give it a try. I've never run a comp cam, but they sure have a ton of choices.

    Anyone ever try the Comp Thumper cams? Looks like they close up the center line to about 107 to give them a lope. Just wondering if these cams actually perform well or is it mostly a gimmick?
    IMO, just more poser stuff......
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink