Thread: Whats good about the 351M
Results 1 to 8 of 8
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksHybrid View
-
12-19-2006 07:15 AM #1
CHR Member/Contributor
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Madison
- Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
- Posts
- 21,160
Never had much luck with the M engines, I prefer the big blocks or Windsor's myself. I guess I never explored them enough to tell you why they don't work the best, I just have always had better performance out of the others.... Oh yeah, have had a couple hard charging Clevelands and used to drag race with a Clevor.....Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
12-19-2006 10:40 AM #2
CHR Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Festus
- Car Year, Make, Model: 75 GMC C-15
- Posts
- 342
351M is a decent utility engine. not the best pick for a performance engine75 GMC C-15 factory 454, automatic, lowered
-
12-19-2006 05:53 PM #3
CHR Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- san diego
- Car Year, Make, Model: 66 mustangFB, 69 econline Drag Van
- Posts
- 1,527
i've had a coupla 351m's.... they're tough.... but dont push as much power... they're just made to take extra abusejust because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Either return this forum to what was or get the HELL OUT!
Dead!