Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Virgin Engine C5AE-A
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Duckie is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Castaic
    Posts
    1

    Virgin Engine C5AE-A

     



    I recently picked up 2 core shortblocks. Both are C5AE-A castings and both have C4AE-B crankshafts. One has C7AE-B rods and the other has C3AE-C rods. One of these engines was a virgin block. It had FoMoCo bearings.

    Now these blocks have a casting # that could make it a 390 or a 427. Cross bolt bosses are unmachined. Both blocks are bored to 390 specs. One is standard the other is 0.030 over. I'm trying to determine if these engines can be bored to 427 specs. Has anyone here had experience boring a C5AE-A block to 427 specs?

  2. #2
    shoprat's Avatar
    shoprat is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Orange
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 RANCHERO
    Posts
    261

    I would doubt if they would bore that far. Sonic check.
    A Ranchero is NOT an El Camino

  3. #3
    FFR428's Avatar
    FFR428 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    fairfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Cougar S code, 427 Tunnelport.
    Posts
    942

    I agree. Most casting numbers are generic and used on many different bore blocks. The C5AE-6015-A is one of them as you see. I have seen some of them go to 4.13" std 406-428 bore but 4.23" would not be likely. And having the cross bolt bosses is a nice option to crossbolt w/factory or aftermarket caps. Some of the C5AE-A blocks were also solid lifter blocks used in the 390 PI engines. Some 352's had that casting number too. Dave Shoe's drill bit test will tell you aprox what you have for cyl wall cores. But as Shoprat said a sonic map is best for exact results. Nice find on that virgin. Not many of those around anymore.

  4. #4
    JeffB2's Avatar
    JeffB2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Phoenix
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1954 Ford Customline 5.0 & AOD
    Posts
    443

    Quote Originally Posted by Duckie View Post
    I recently picked up 2 core shortblocks. Both are C5AE-A castings and both have C4AE-B crankshafts. One has C7AE-B rods and the other has C3AE-C rods. One of these engines was a virgin block. It had FoMoCo bearings.

    Now these blocks have a casting # that could make it a 390 or a 427. Cross bolt bosses are unmachined. Both blocks are bored to 390 specs. One is standard the other is 0.030 over. I'm trying to determine if these engines can be bored to 427 specs. Has anyone here had experience boring a C5AE-A block to 427 specs?
    Boring it to make it a 406 is do able and the 406's were not any thing to sneeze at performance wise.

  5. #5
    Duckie is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Castaic
    Posts
    1

    Quote Originally Posted by FFR428 View Post
    I agree. Most casting numbers are generic and used on many different bore blocks. The C5AE-6015-A is one of them as you see. I have seen some of them go to 4.13" std 406-428 bore but 4.23" would not be likely. And having the cross bolt bosses is a nice option to crossbolt w/factory or aftermarket caps. Some of the C5AE-A blocks were also solid lifter blocks used in the 390 PI engines. Some 352's had that casting number too. Dave Shoe's drill bit test will tell you aprox what you have for cyl wall cores. But as Shoprat said a sonic map is best for exact results. Nice find on that virgin. Not many of those around anymore.
    I was suprized to find it was a virgin block too. Very little rust in the cores and no sludge in the engine. Only problem I found was the #1 and 5 rod bearings were 10 miles away from spinning. Other than that the crank was perfect. But it should clean up at 0.010 under.

    I did the drill bit test and if one of those blocks can be bored to 427 spect it's the virgin. Slightly bigger gap than .180" between the cylinders. I'm gonna get is sonic checked and I have my fingers crossed. The other may only be able to go 0.060 over 390 specs. Lots of rust in the cores of that one. When I got it all 6 core plugs were rusted through. That one is a good candidate for a muratic acid bath to get rid of the rust. That block is already 0.030 over and may be junk but at least the crank and rods were good.

  6. #6
    shoprat's Avatar
    shoprat is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Orange
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 RANCHERO
    Posts
    261

    .060 always worked good for me. My 4000lb Ranchero ran 12's with a .060 390
    for years. It took a 427 and a lot of money to get it in the mid 11's.
    A Ranchero is NOT an El Camino

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink