Thread: Super Charged IH sv345

Tweet

Hah! That's the first time I've heard a Binder and a Hemi called anything the same!
IHC never made a car, but a '61 Scout was smaller than many cars. the later Scouts had 345's and were nose heavy dogs. I've had a few of virtually every vehicle IH ever made, and none of them were any hot rods. Even put a 304 in a '61 scout! Had a few IHC's with Hemi's in 'em, too. Much better than 345's!

Originally Posted by R Pope

Hah! That's the first time I've heard a Binder and a Hemi called anything the same!
IHC never made a car, but a '61 Scout was smaller than many cars. the later Scouts had 345's and were nose heavy dogs. I've had a few of virtually every vehicle IH ever made, and none of them were any hot rods. Even put a 304 in a '61 scout! Had a few IHC's with Hemi's in 'em, too. Much better than 345's!

i knew a guy that had a bbc 427 in one

Originally Posted by R Pope

Hah! That's the first time I've heard a Binder and a Hemi called anything the same!
IHC never made a car, but a '61 Scout was smaller than many cars. the later Scouts had 345's and were nose heavy dogs. I've had a few of virtually every vehicle IH ever made, and none of them were any hot rods. Even put a 304 in a '61 scout! Had a few IHC's with Hemi's in 'em, too. Much better than 345's!

How about IH sv392 and Chrysler 392 Hemi ?
That 61 Scout was an American made mini-truck.
The Scout IIs are nose heavy, especially with a driving front axel.
so is a Dodge dart when you shoehorn in a 392 Hemi (see picture below)
the sv345 does weigh 150 lbs more than a SBC @ 575 lbs,
sv392 = 765 lbs,
392 Hemi = 767 lbs