Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By jerry clayton

Thread: Dial Bore Cylinder Question
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Rdobbs1977's Avatar
    Rdobbs1977 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Nashville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1972 Z28 Camaro Drag Car,2500lbs w/motor
    Posts
    113

    Dial Bore Cylinder Question

     



    Been experimenting with some Telescopic Gauges and a dial bore gauge thanks to Denny. Assuming I've been doing things right, my dial bore gauge taper measurements from top, middle, bottom of each cylinder looked pretty good and i inputted the readings into an excel file. Although i don't have the file in front of me (can post later), I don't recall seeing any taper variance beyond 0.0005. From what I've gathered so far, it appears that the dial bore gauge appears more accurate or at least is much quicker. I've noticed with the telescopic gauge, it seems to require a little more patience and finess with your hands when you go to lock it down before taking it out of cylinder. Nonetheless, both tools are in in-experienced/or a new learner's hands (me). Anyhoo, i got to thinking and my curiosity has got me wanting to ask a question. A lot of my cylinder measurements (on a 4.030 motor/355) come out to around 4.033 or 4.032. If i do the math that shows a difference of .003 or .002 from a true 4.030. I've heard machinists, when they bore, like to be within .0001. Anyhow, i was just curious if a guy was measuring the size of a cylinder how much of a difference from what it should be to what he measured it at, before its rebore time? .005-.007? Example, assume a 4.030 measured 4.0330 both ways from top, middle, and bottom of cylinder. That would be Zero variance at all levels but the cylinder as a whole would be .003 oversized. In my estimation that appears very reasonable, but what is the max before a rebore is needed?
    1972 Z28 Camaro, Full Drag Car, 383 CID
    1976 Camaro
    Currently building a 1.21 Gigawatt Flux Capacitor

  2. #2
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    When you are thatclose on the specs-the cylinder wall surface finish is probably more important than that little bit of clearance-
    Most chevy bores are stated at .001 over the nominal size------4.001, 4.021, 4.031--------

    You need to mearsure the pistons to determine there sizes before worrying what the cylinder size is. Also, if you don't have a dial bore setting guage--use the same mike to measure the piston that you use to measure/set the dial bore guage------

    and also the use of a torque plate will change/alter the cylinder shape the same as if a head was torqued in place and this is reason race engine builders will use torque plates and temperture conttrol to get the most accurrate results
    Last edited by jerry clayton; 10-02-2017 at 07:22 PM.
    techinspector1 and Rdobbs1977 like this.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink