Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: new top end and no more power???
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35
  1. #1
    les4metal is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    reno
    Posts
    38

    new top end and no more power???

     



    i just did a head, cam and intake swap on my 350. everything i did are as follows:

    Trick Flow 195cc Heads with 62cc chambers
    Summit 1105 camshaft (224*/234* @.050) and lifters
    Pro Magnum 1.6 Roller Rockers
    new pushrods.....yes, i checked the geometry
    Felpro performance ultra thin shim gasket .015 compressed thickness
    Ported High Rise intake manifold w/spacer ported to the plenum
    rebuilt carter 625 carb
    new HEI distributor w/MSD rev limiting module
    new wires, spark plugs, starter


    i put all this on the factory 74 short block. i'm assuming there about -20cc dish pistons. therefore, giving me a compression ratio just over 9.25:1

    now i'm not sure what going on...i've adjusted the valves 3 times because i thought that's what it was and that i just kept messing up somehow. but now i know that's not the case.

    before i did the swap i was getting about 115 to 125psi cranking compression. now i'm only getting 100 tops!!!!! and the power is horrible. according to Comp Cams Dynosim, i should be making about 385hp. i have used this program on several of my friends cars ('69 firebird, 92 trans am, 69 camaro, etc.) and surprisingly enough, for all their dyno'd cars, this program has been within 5hp on ALL OF THEM. i know this program works very well.

    there is no detonation, no smoke coming out of the exhaust, my a/f ratio is between 12.5:1 and 13.5:1 from idle to redline, no driving quality issues other than just no power.

    what is going on? i've been frustrated with this for weeks

    PLEASE HELP ME
    thanks

  2. #2
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    did you degree your cam in did . are the marks line up on your timming set did you check you damper if it slip or the pointer lines up at tdc did you check this when you had the heads off . what curve and springs and stop bushing do you have in the dist
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  3. #3
    les4metal is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    reno
    Posts
    38

    yes i did degree the cam. i was fine and had 5* of advance built in it. just like the cam card said. i did retard it 2 degrees for a little more top end. the marks line up for the 2 degrees of retard. i used a new crank key and it was at the #1 TDC. i've made the mistake of having it at the #6 TDC before but not this time.
    and it's a brand new summit distributor with one of the lightest springs in Morosos advance kit and one of the stock springs with it. i left the weights and bushings because they are brand new. my initial timing is 14 BTDC and total goes to about 36. i've tried backing it off a bit and advancing it a little more too and neither helped. but when i did advance it i could go as much as 50 total with no detonation under load driving what's with that?

  4. #4
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    did you put a vacuum gauges check out your EX
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  5. #5
    moter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Depok, Indonesia
    Posts
    217

    I would be willing to bet its the camshaft....what is the centerline of the cam? I would say put it straight up.....take out the two degrees.

  6. #6
    les4metal is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    reno
    Posts
    38

    no haven't tried the vacuum gauge yet. i'll do that today. thanks.

    and that camshaft has a 114* LSA and a 109* intake centerline/119* exhaust centerline. that's why i figured that 2 degrees wouldn't be so bad. that still gives me 3* advance, correct? even if that did take away some power (dynosim said otherwise) i should still be making a ton more that stock. i'm just really confused.

  7. #7
    moter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Depok, Indonesia
    Posts
    217

    are you just going by "seat of the pants" to determine it has no power?

  8. #8
    skids72's Avatar
    skids72 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Lafayette
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Firebird 439 BBC
    Posts
    745

    what was the duration of the old cam? I'm willing to bet it's quite less than 224*... that's where your cranking compression went. What vehicle is this in? Transmission? Torque converter? Gear ratio? Where does it not "seem" to have enough power? Out of the hole or up top? Does it pull at high revs? What is your redline? What fuel are you using (octane)? Retarding the cam also is killing your cylinder pressure... all this explains why you can run so much timing lead... try running some crap regular gas in it and you might find more power

    -Chris
    Paint don't make it no faster

  9. #9
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    In your calculations for static compression ratio, I suspect you forgot the piston deck height. I further suspect that on that year motor, the piston is down in the bore by about 0.030".
    cylinder 727
    chamber 62
    piston crown 22
    piston deck 6
    gasket 3
    820/93 equals 8.81:1
    That cam would work well with 9.75 to 10.0, but it ain't gonna work too well with 8.81, particularly being retarded by 2 degrees. You might try advancing it 4 degrees from straight up and see how it works.
    Last edited by techinspector1; 09-08-2008 at 02:25 PM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  10. #10
    les4metal is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    reno
    Posts
    38

    seat of the pants and also my friend has this "G TECH" dohicky that is also very accurate...we have used it on dyno'd cars and it and awesome tuning tool.

    the old cam was stock, along with the heads and intake etc. i have a 4 speed in a 1960 chevy truck (3700 lbs w/me in it and a full tank of gas) 3.73 rear gears. 28 in tall tire. it pulls fine until about 3500ish rpm. i dyno'd the truck and it made a whopping 206 whp @ 5200rpm up here at 4500 ft. which equates to about 230hp at sea level. it power just levels off for the most part after 3500. but i'm shifting at around 5500 where i should be. right now i'm using shell regular 89 octane for gas.

    and in my compression i did not forget the deck height or the piston dish.
    stock piston dish is 20cc for my 74 truck 350. it is also bored .060 over.
    stock deck height is .025
    gasket is .015 inch compressed....etc.
    and with all that info put into the compression ratio equation, comes out to exactly 9.17:1

    and the cam has 5 degrees of advance built into the lobes. isn't 9 degrees of cam advance a little excessive???? and i honestly don't think that i need that much compression for this cam, yeah a little more because of the elevation, but even edelbrocks performer rpm crate engine only has 9.5 to 1 compression and that cam is quite a bit bigger than mine.

    also my friend has the performer rpm cam in his pontiac 428 with just under 9:1 compression and he is even getting a minimum of 120 psi cranking. that cam has 4 degrees of advance built in it.
    so theoretically my cam installed exactly how it is in the truck (retarded 2 degrees) is only retarded 1 degree more than his with about the same compression ratio and he has a lot more duration/overlap than mine too. AND he has .5* less LSA!

  11. #11
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Swell. Have it your way.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  12. #12
    les4metal is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    reno
    Posts
    38

    hey i'm not saying i don't appreciate your advice, i do. but what's the reason for what you're suggesting? i just replied with what i know from experience and what i've read elsewhere. and i've never heard of advancing a cam a total of 9 degrees. i'm just frustrated and confused. sorry if i sound rude, i really don't mean to. thanks

  13. #13
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    What exhaust are you running?

    Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

  14. #14
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    Cranking pressure has everything to do with the cam.Unless rings are shot or the valves are not seating correctly {from bad machine work or being held open}.
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

  15. #15
    skids72's Avatar
    skids72 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Lafayette
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Firebird 439 BBC
    Posts
    745

    I wouldn't put too much weight on your G-Tech results... I have one that says I'm putting out ~250HP but my timeslip says otherwise (~400HP). The G-Tech can be a useful tool to determine the relative effectiveness of various mods but I think the absolute power/tq reported can be quite inaccurate. As for advancing the cam, you will not increase your cylinder pressure without advancing the cam.... at the very least install it straight up (with ground in 5* advance) and see if that feels a little more stout. Are you sure you're getting good spark at the higher revs? How did you set your valve lash? How are your valve springs?

    -Chris
    Paint don't make it no faster

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink