Results 1 to 3 of 3
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThreaded View
-
11-09-2006 11:05 AM #3
CHR Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- so.cal
- Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
- Posts
- 1,942
Those heads are either 56 or 58 cc.With the old head ccs you could determine how much of a increase you would get,...ie 1/2 point 2 points more.If the numbers are on the block front pad ,block is not milled ,That leaves the pistons.025 approx down in the hole . You could peek in the sparkplug hole and see what type pistons,d-cup,flat top or big dish and get an approxamate static compression,need cam specs for dynamic compression.Could end up with pretty good gas mileage with those heads too
I could see 1200 rpm at 65 cruse with that set-up. My mustang at 65 is at 1500 rpm and thats a 302 , plus more vehichle weight.
Last edited by shawnlee28; 11-09-2006 at 11:59 PM.
Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
A belated Happy 78th Birthday Roger Spears
Belated Happy Birthday