Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Quench and soup bowls
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Quench and soup bowls

     



    I know the importance of a good quench area and run some high end street engines such as iron headed 10.9:1 383 with 200psi cranking pressure on pump gas. I like to zero deck my block and run a .039 gasket with flat tops and 64cc chambers. I understand the quench concept to help swirl the air/fuel mixture in the chamber.

    My problem now is I have never ran a soup bowl piston. I love flat tops for max power and second best is inverted dome/D-shaped for lower compression.

    Now, what about soup bowl turbo/blower type pistons. Will the tight quench area actually help anything when you have a negative 34cc bowl type piston top. Seems to me like it would be the same as running a loose quench. Any thoughts/experiences?


    These are to be used in a blower application and it seems to me that they will not benifit from a tight quench. Maybe a thicker gasket to reduce CR would be better in this application???

    My pistons are 9.0:1 inverted dome and they reap the rewards of the tight quench being able to run 6+ lbs boost on pump gas. Will soup bowls do this under the same circumstances??
    Last edited by camaro_fever68; 01-05-2006 at 01:37 AM.
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    "My problem now is I have never ran a soup bowl piston. I love flat tops for max power and second best is inverted dome/D-shaped for lower compression."

    I haven't either and I don't intend to at this late stage of my life. Same as you, flat-tops and D-dishes work well, why change?

    "Maybe a thicker gasket to reduce CR would be better in this application???"

    Wrong approach. CR should be set with the combustion chamber volume and the piston crown configuration. Then a gasket of the proper thickness should be chosen to work with the deck height of the motor to set the quench figure at 0.035" to 0.040".
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  3. #3
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    Quench can't be all that important, Hemis don't have any! haha.

  4. #4
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Originally posted by R Pope
    Quench can't be all that important, Hemis don't have any! haha.
    With a hemi, you have a centrally located spark plug and it's the same distance from the plug to the farthest point in any direction, so you have no hot and cold areas of the chamber and the flame front has an equal chance of firing off in all directions.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink