Thread: Looks like the deal is off...........

Tweet

Originally Posted by NTFDAY

What do you think the long term effect of that announcement will be, Uncle Bob?

Tough one to noodle without inside info. First, my gut doesn't quite buy the "bad economy" line. My first inclination is that old line board members didn't like doing the split, but that the announcement didn't want to disclose a political agenda. Might be related to 'burghs comment. Or, in doing acquisition due diligence HD found some info that made them nervous about the future viability, or the cost to keep it viable. Pro drag racing might be on the verge of some serious financial issues (totally speculation). Again, this is not something that the parties would want to admit in a press release.

If the honchos at NHRA aren't good enough promoters to bring in a big time sponsor for the series that could end up being a big problem. It appears,NASCAR had to work pretty hard to come up with a sponsor the size of Nationwide for the former Busch Series, and they've got much more public appeal (despite shrinking ratings) than does NHRA. Time will disclose what's really going on if the press release is obfuscating.

I just checked the entry list for Pomona and there are 14 cars entered in Top Fuel, 18 in Funny and 23 in Pro Stock. I realize that that is not set in stone, but I have to wonder since this is the first race of the year.
I've read about the funding requirements for one or any of the Pro categories and you better have some pretty deep pockets. I wonder if we have passed the apex in the pro categories?
I once thought that a 5.39 or 5.40 at 340 or better was attainable in Top Fuel, but...................

That's a little thin for top fuel with only a week to go. And almost a quarter of the entries for Funny are from one team (assuming JFR is entering 4).

You're old enough to remember the write ups on the "200 mph barrier" I'll bet.

I remember that sometime in the late '50's some fellow with a slide rule determined that 150 or 160 or somewhere around those numbers (my memory isn't as good as it used to be) was the going to be the top attainable speed in a quarter mile. I believe that Garlits or Chris or maybe Eddie Hill surpassed his prediction before he could put the thing back in his pocket.

Yeah, I think it was Roger Huntington when he was tech editor at Hot Rod, or maybe Motor Trend. The more I think about it it may have been an odd number like 167 or something like that.

Originally Posted by NTFDAY

I just checked the entry list for Pomona and there are 14 cars entered in Top Fuel,...........

There were 57 Top Fuel entries trying to qualify for 32 positions at the '69 U.S. Nationals .............. and we now have 14 entries for a major race .......... becoming a business has done sooooo much for this sport ........... no wonder the deal fell through

It was an MIT professor who said it was "physically impossible" for a wheel driven vehicle to exceed 150 MPH in a standing start 1/4 mile.

And as stated above, literally before he put his slide rule away a car called the "Bustle Bomb" went 151 MPH!!

How many of you remember the car? It had a Caddy up front driving through a 3 speed trans and an Olds in the back with direct drive.

Or maybe the Olds was up front and the Caddy in the back....what the hell, I'm old!!

Geez, the Bustle Bomb has been a favorite around here. Here's a couple surviving threads (a couple more have been lost to the dying server gods);

http://www.clubhotrod.com/forums/hot...ag-racing.html

http://www.clubhotrod.com/forums/dra...nostalgia.html