Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree10Likes

Thread: supercharged 302
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 19 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    wheelswithin is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Babylon
    Posts
    16

    Thanks all.
    Unfortunately Ford Racing only offers crate engine in 351w with 10.5 compress. I called to see if they can build 9.1 no dice. Too high for a blower. Here is their website:
    Crate Engines, Mustang Engines, Drag Racing Engines, Stock Car Engines, Funny Car Engins, Race Engines, Racing Engines - Ford Racing Performance Parts

    Can anyone recommend a builder with a great rep?

  2. #2
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    Crate engines and blowers are usually not compatible. If you want a blower, you need to build your engine around it.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  3. #3
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    Moving the engine back into the fire wall area is a poor choice as it creates several problems----------------clearance gained in the front is paid for dearly by many new problem areas--foot/leg room, steering column issues from steering wheel angle to header clearance, foot pedal problems, etc--------

    Most clearance problems in the front arrive with the cross member for the front spring mounting being raised to let the front set lower------a standard type cross member with reversed spring eyes or de arched will allow more clearance around the front pulley/dampner and accessory drive components-------

    But I do agree that a frame stretch in that area would help with lots of stuff and would allow the components to be laid out in a much more acceptable/visual way---------and Rootlieb or other hood /side panel makers would have no problem making hoods for anything up thru 1934 stuff(beford the fenders started getting "FAT")
    rspears likes this.

  4. #4
    wheelswithin is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Babylon
    Posts
    16

    All great replies guys! Thank you for taking the time to post your thoughts and knowledge. Bookmarking this thread when I have the $$ for a build.

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink