Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Front shocks
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 18 of 18
  1. #16
    406Rich's Avatar
    406Rich is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Elkgrove
    Car Year, Make, Model: `37 Ford Bus Coupe
    Posts
    823

    When I built the`33 I used 23 degrees as a shock angle, the guy that bought the sedan from me said that it rides nice and handles well, although he did up grade the shocks as well.
    Attached Images
    Toys
    `37 Ford Coupe
    `64 Chevy Fleet side
    `69 RS/SS
    `68 Dodge Dart
    Kids in the back seat may cause accidents, accidents in the back seat may cause kids, so no back seat, no accidents...!

  2. #17
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    406--fronts out toward the wheel is nice as for the leverage altho those look to be a little bit close to the bottom out point but I bet is a super deal for the leaf spring suspension


    Rears---very close to a OEM setup probably used on billions of leaf spring rears and would be very hard to out engineer the set up you have----

    Most of these things come frompeople cross mixing parts that are not compatible---the valving for a shock for a coil spring will always be different from a leaf ( and a single leaf front or rear is a different animal also

  3. #18
    roadster32's Avatar
    roadster32 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    watford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 26T Coupe, 32 Roadster, 41 Willys Coupe
    Posts
    2,363

    I'm with Jerry on this one, so many people lay them over because they look nice They don't seem to think about efficiency.

    I used to have a chart on the wall that explained lay over and efficiency losses, If i remember right you lose 20% of the shocks efficiency for every 5 degrees they lay over, It always makes me laugh when i see cars at shows with the shocks at 45 degrees, they ain't doing jack

    I also like the Bilsteins


    Quote Originally Posted by jerry clayton View Post
    Don---the differances between your two cars is significant--one is probably around 45 degrees but in front of the axle--the other is more uprite at probably 20 degrees or less and behind the axle---If they were the same shocks-might be about the same dampening effect as the ones behind the axle would be stonger in dampening but more challanged by the rate to uspension travel---
    the ones in front of the axle, while having a better rate would be subject to a severe change of percentage as the angle will be multiplied severely as the suspension travlels downward making the shock lay down--


    And, yes , you pretty much have to go with what the mountings are , but the effects of the mountings are drastic---

    Now if its a coil-over application the angles of operation will also cause the spring rate to vary (helps in roll as car leans)

    try going to www.QA-1.net
    Its aweful lonesome in the saddle since my horse died.

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink