Hybrid View
-
08-28-2009 09:12 AM #1
Does that give me the correct width?
-
08-28-2009 09:41 AM #2
Try to find one out of an early Ford Bronco. They are just the right width. The website below is a good reference for 9-inch Ford widths.
www.enjenjo.com/9inch.htmlLast edited by rumrumm; 08-28-2009 at 09:47 AM.

Lynn
'32 3W
There's no 12 step program for stupid!
http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson
-
08-28-2009 10:18 AM #3
Thanks. Great website. WOW. Still trying to find a donor type car for the dics brakes, Lincoln maybe?
-
08-28-2009 10:22 AM #4
Thanks StuCool. You responded before I did. Good input. Also the width of early Bronco - 58" at wheel mount flange?
-
08-28-2009 02:16 PM #5
Great contribution rumrumm, I've added it to the 9" article on the Crankshaft Coalition wiki on another forum....
http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/w...nd_informationPLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
08-28-2009 02:47 PM #6
Some Lincolns from the 70's had Ford 9" axles with disc brakes. I just got some off a 77 Continental Mark V to go on my 75 Bronco.
As mentioned before, Ford Explorers had disc brakes that would bolt onto the 9". I think the years are from 96 to 2001. In fact, the rearends of those Explorers were 8.8" axles which aren't too shabby.
If you want a Bronco axle, try www.classicbroncos.com. There are always folks with extras.
MarkLast edited by Mark in Memphis; 08-28-2009 at 02:55 PM.
-
08-30-2009 05:58 AM #7
-
08-30-2009 07:43 PM #8
For a fendered 32
Most rodders ... want a rear end that is 56 to 58 inches wide ... measured this way

Unfortunately ... the only Factory setups that narrow are the 57/58/59 Ford car rear ends and the 66 to mid 70's Broncos. The Broncos have the larger 5 on 5.5 wheel pattern ( think Ford pickup pattern ). They are 58 inches wide.
TCI sells their 32 chassis with a 56 inch 9 inch under them. They come from Currie and are narrowed units. NO stock 56 inch wide units ever came from Ford.
This is a 56 inch wide 9 inch under my 32 3W.

And now with the fenders on ...

This is a 58 inch wide 9 inch Bronco rear end under my 32 roadster

Both space the rim out about the same but the 32 roadster has 1 inch per side LESS offset than the ones on the 32 3W.
Some of the Lincoln Versailles ( 1979 or so ) are narrow enough ( with a proper back spacing rim ) and are 9 inch units.
Think fancied up Ford Granda
They come with factory rear disc brakes. BUT ... I would not use one because the brake parts are VERY difficult to find and VERY EXPENSIVE if you do.
Hope this HELPS
Going 33 and 1/3 rpms in a IPOD world
-
08-31-2009 09:33 AM #9
I have been provided with alot of info on Ford 9". Thanks. I am now looking for a 9" from a 66-77 Ford Bronco 58" wide or 77-81 Granada/Versailles 58 1/2" wide. Next I plan to get a conversion kit to use Ford Explorer disc brakes. Then for a good highway gear maybe a 2.75 ratio.
1) What Fords commonly have a posi/limited slip rear end?
2) What rear end ratio is commonly used in a Ford Explorer?






LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Either return this forum to what was or get the HELL OUT!
Dead!