Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: My next move with hiboy's metamorphosis
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 133

Threaded View

  1. #9
    Henry Rifle's Avatar
    Henry Rifle is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Little Elm
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford Low Boy w/ZZ430 Clone
    Posts
    3,890

    A lot of folks on this thread are speaking of "the look" as if there's only one "look." "The look" is a matter of personal preference. Some think a car doesn't have "the look" if it has shiny paint. Others think it doesn't have "the look" if it isn't 2" off the ground. Others think it doesn't have "the look" if it isn't chopped. Others don't think it has "the look" unless everything on the car is CNC carved, polished billet.

    I guess Foose's latest Riddler winner doesn't have "the look." And, what does "period correct" with reference to tires on a '32 roadster really mean? Does every '32 have to have a certain "look?" It isn't right without the "politically correct" tires?

    Frankly, I am more than amazed at this thread in total.

    By the way, terms like L78/15 are way too new for the original context of this thread. If you're not talking about 670-15 or 750-14, the tires are too new for "the look."
    Last edited by Henry Rifle; 03-22-2007 at 09:25 AM.
    Jack

    Gone to Texas

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink