Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree26Likes

Thread: 327 Build Cam Selection
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 79

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    As for the Double Hump Fuelly Heads not being up to the task . Your talking an under 400 H.P Engine that He won't be running much over 5500 and the set he has are 2.02"in and 1.60" ex Heads . Can't see spending over a grand on a set of aluminum Heads for this build only to top it off with a Mild Performance intake . Yes if you have not Ported Heads don't try and do it with out someone there who has . It's an art form that take many years to Learn . Remember this them old Hump Head where used on Dragsters in the old days after being full Ported .

    As for that 280H Turning off at 5500 I have had it in 350's that E.T-ed best when shifted at 6200 . No Dyno just Track Time Slips it will not turn off at 5500 if the rest of the build is up for the Task .

    And that L-79 #151 Camshaft I have ran in all Kinds of SB's . G.M Measured it in a Different way on the adv dur .

    Part # Lifter type--duration at .050 In/ex--Lift in/ex--centerline--description

    3863151 Hyd. - 221/221-.447/.447-114 - 327-350HP, L79

    Look at that 114 C/L Helps Top end and Idle but hurts Torque . The Later 350-350 H.P Camshaft is Much better .

    Part # Lifter type--duration at .050 In/ex--Lift in/ex--centerline--description

    3896962 Hyd. - 222/222 - .450/.460-114 - 350-350 , L-82


    As for the 280H vs the XE268H You answered you own Question by shown the .050" 224 vs the 230 dur yes that will make the Difference as it shows in Low end Torque . Also on a street car with Full Exhaust the added Cam size in Lift and Dur on the Exhaust side help clear the Exhaust .

    My Friend is Building a 327 right now I sent him an L-82 Camshaft I had but it was made with a 109 L/C grind I think it's going to work well .
    Wisdom is acquired by experience, not just by age

  2. #2
    H.O.Rider is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Saskatoon
    Posts
    43

    great stuff...yes I have a friend with a 66 Canso Sport deluxe and he is running the air gap RPM under his stock hood. The quench will be on the money at .040".
    The guys at Comp and Lunati said I should be able to get away with the XE 268 or VooDoo comparable but could run into some detonation issues. This why I steered clear. I asked two guys at Comp who had all my info, "If this was your car, what cam would you run?" and they both said 280H.

    In terms of the comparisons I made between the 268 and 280, I realize there is a difference on the intake side with none on the exhaust. And those 6 degrees at .050" will hurt my torque. Just don't think it's as big as some may think. So how will going to a bigger high rise manifold help my streetability...if that is a word.... haha

    No plans on porting as this car will never be on the drag strip. Just a street car to make a bit of noise with. Had I wanted HUGE power I would have went 383 or 406. I chose the small journal 327 instead.

  3. #3
    1gary is offline Banned Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Roch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1985 high top Astro van
    Posts
    2,520

    Quote Originally Posted by tango View Post
    As for the Double Hump Fuelly Heads not being up to the task . Your talking an under 400 H.P Engine that He won't be running much over 5500 and the set he has are 2.02"in and 1.60" ex Heads . Can't see spending over a grand on a set of aluminum Heads for this build only to top it off with a Mild Performance intake . Yes if you have not Ported Heads don't try and do it with out someone there who has . It's an art form that take many years to Learn . Remember this them old Hump Head where used on Dragsters in the old days after being full Ported .

    As for that 280H Turning off at 5500 I have had it in 350's that E.T-ed best when shifted at 6200 . No Dyno just Track Time Slips it will not turn off at 5500 if the rest of the build is up for the Task .

    And that L-79 #151 Camshaft I have ran in all Kinds of SB's . G.M Measured it in a Different way on the adv dur .

    Part # Lifter type--duration at .050 In/ex--Lift in/ex--centerline--description

    3863151 Hyd. - 221/221-.447/.447-114 - 327-350HP, L79

    Look at that 114 C/L Helps Top end and Idle but hurts Torque . The Later 350-350 H.P Camshaft is Much better .

    Part # Lifter type--duration at .050 In/ex--Lift in/ex--centerline--description

    3896962 Hyd. - 222/222 - .450/.460-114 - 350-350 , L-82


    As for the 280H vs the XE268H You answered you own Question by shown the .050" 224 vs the 230 dur yes that will make the Difference as it shows in Low end Torque . Also on a street car with Full Exhaust the added Cam size in Lift and Dur on the Exhaust side help clear the Exhaust .

    My Friend is Building a 327 right now I sent him an L-82 Camshaft I had but it was made with a 109 L/C grind I think it's going to work well .
    What are the intake runner CC's on those heads??.My point is don't you need to have those numbers to come up with these dyno sym numbers??.
    Last edited by 1gary; 11-24-2011 at 05:00 PM.
    Good Bye

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink