Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 327 build with mixed views on carburation
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 15

Threaded View

  1. #1
    OSK's Avatar
    OSK
    OSK is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bremerton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 36' Buick Coupe,
    Posts
    291

    327 build with mixed views on carburation

     



    Built a mid 60's small journal 327. Engine specs are forged steel crank, around mains n studs, hydraulic roller with 1.6 rockers, 7372 magnum comp cams pushrods,dual stage springs from comp cams, a 495 cam, heads were punched to 2.02, intake is a 60's era streetmaster from eldelbrock. The question is carbs Cause I've got mixed emotions. Spec'd out anything over 700 cfm is basically pointless given how much the engine says it will use but I certainly don't want undercarburation either. A few options on the shelf are a first version edition throttle body Holley, the old ones with the user tuning adjustment on the brain. The throttle body is a 640. Second choice is a Holley double Pumper which is in the same range, or a vintage Carter afb which is also in the same range. Last choice is to go new and step up to a 750. I've messed around in the past swapping carbs on other motors I'd built but this one has a bit more time n money invested so I thought id see what another point of view may bring to the table as I'm always up for some new knowledge when it comes to motors. If I missed something lemme know its late but I've been thinking about that dang motor all day.
    Last edited by OSK; 07-25-2011 at 03:26 PM. Reason: incorrect part listed

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink