Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: school me on valvesprings
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    matthew_rhodes is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Mobile
    Posts
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by Bouncer View Post
    From what your link provided I would choose VSK-0001

    Be sure to add ZINC additive to the oil if you want to keep the lobes on the cam.
    thanks for the info, as far as the zinc ill be running a racing oil that includes the zinc additive

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    This is an interesting exercise for those of you who like to play with numbers (like me ) .

    0.2600" intake lift at the cam will theoretically be 0.390" intake lift at the valve and 0.2733" exhaust lift at the cam will theoretically be 0.410" exhaust lift at the valve with a conventional 1.5 rocker arm. I say theoretically because I don't think there ever was a true 1.5 stamped steel rocker produced by Chevrolet. Every one I ever checked was less than that, with some down around 1.45:1 as I remember. That's one of the reasons to purchase aftermarket rockers, because you get the true design lift at the valve. At any rate, we'll consider that this young man has some 1.5 rockers and that the valve lift is 0.390"/0.410".

    Pro-Tek didn't supply us with the spring RATE, but we can figure it out.
    Coil springs are pretty much linear as you apply pressure to them, so if the VSK-0001 springs are 103 on the seat and 300 lbs @ 0.500" lift, a difference of 197 lbs, then we can divide 197 by 500 and find that for each 0.001" of lift, the pressure increases by 0.394 lbs.

    Now, if we multiply 390 times .394, we find that the pressure will increase on the intake by 153.66 lbs from valve closed to valve open at full lift. Now, if we add the seat pressure to that (153.66 + 103), we find that the intake spring pressure is 256.66 lbs. over the nose. Multiplying 410 times .394 will tell us that the exhaust pressure increase is 161.54 lbs. Adding 161.54 and 103 will tell us that the exhaust spring pressure over the nose is 264.54 lbs. We can drop the decimals and just call it 256/264.

    Now, since we know that pressed-in rocker arm studs begin to pull out of the heads at pressures around 250 lbs and higher, we now know that we must either pin the studs or pull the studs, tap the holes and install screw-in studs or we can mill the pads, tap the holes and install screw-in studs with guide plates.
    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/MRG-806G/
    Last edited by techinspector1; 12-05-2010 at 04:28 PM.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink