Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: I can't decide what engine to build....need advice
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by 35chevy View Post
    Can you help me understand the difference between the recommended 282 solid and the 282 roller? Duration is pretty close, the solid is 236/236 and the roller is 230/236. the intake valve closing point on the solid is 44 degrees and the roller is 41 degrees. wouldn't that make the roller have a higher dynamic compression since the intake valve closes earlier? What an I missing here?

    Because of the lifter having a roller on the cam end vs. a flat surface, more aggresive rates can be used on the cam lift.... then there's the friction thing, a roller offers much less friction and wear on the cam lobe then does a flat tappet.... Richard can give you all the specifics on the difference in cam specs, I'm one of the "lightweights" on cam selection, and always defer to the experts at selection time!!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by 35chevy View Post
    Can you help me understand the difference between the recommended 282 solid and the 282 roller? Duration is pretty close, the solid is 236/236 and the roller is 230/236. the intake valve closing point on the solid is 44 degrees and the roller is 41 degrees. wouldn't that make the roller have a higher dynamic compression since the intake valve closes earlier? What an I missing here?
    Yeah, I must have used closing numbers from a different grind. Sorry. I went back to the post and changed it so that subsequent readers will be able to make sense of it, then added a dyno of the 12-432-8.
    Last edited by techinspector1; 04-19-2009 at 03:55 AM.

  3. #3
    35chevy's Avatar
    35chevy is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Elba
    Car Year, Make, Model: '35 Master Chevrolet
    Posts
    139

    Because of the lifter having a roller on the cam end vs. a flat surface, more aggresive rates can be used on the cam lift.... then there's the friction thing, a roller offers much less friction and wear on the cam lobe then does a flat tappet.... Richard can give you all the specifics on the difference in cam specs, I'm one of the "lightweights" on cam selection, and always defer to the experts at selection time!!!!!
    I understand the difference between flat tappet and roller....I'm trying to understand the difference in dynamic compression between the two. These two cams look real similar. I used the dynamic compression calculator on Keith black's website and I came up with 8.095 with the xr282hr roller and 7.941 with the solid lift 282s. Techinspector1, are you getting the dynamic compression numbers from the DynoSim software? I'm not sure how accurate the calc. that I'm using is. I like the xr276hr too though....

  4. #4
    35chevy's Avatar
    35chevy is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Elba
    Car Year, Make, Model: '35 Master Chevrolet
    Posts
    139

    Personally, I wouldn't trade 14 ft/lbs @ 2000 for 12 hp @ 5000. The motor will be seeing 2000 way more often than it will 5000.
    That's the same page I was on, Later.............

  5. #5
    35chevy's Avatar
    35chevy is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Elba
    Car Year, Make, Model: '35 Master Chevrolet
    Posts
    139

    Just for kicks I emailed comp cams for a camshaft recommendation. They recommended the xr288hr-10. I tried the camquest software and this cam is one of the ones recommended. I'm pretty settled on a smaller cam. I'm just wondering how they come up with thier recommendation? What software do they use?
    Last edited by 35chevy; 05-14-2009 at 01:51 PM.

  6. #6
    vara4's Avatar
    vara4 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1947 International Pick Up
    Posts
    3,188

    Tech are you sure that picture is appropriate for this site?
    Oh those are cams, sorry about that.
    Reminded me of something else.
    HE! HE! HE! Kurt

Reply To Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink