Results 1 to 12 of 12
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThreaded View
-
09-05-2008 03:47 AM #8
CHR Member
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
- Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
- Posts
- 12,423
76 looks like a weak-suck combination to me. I'd be lookin' for at least 400 ft./lbs. of torque under 4000 r's. You don't have to settle for 8.5:1 compression ratio either. If you run a tight (0.035" to 0.045") squish, you can operate on pump gas up to 10.0:1 or more with no problem, even with iron heads.
If you liked ryanscarpage, you're gonna love this link. In order to make any sense out of comparing one head to another, compare them at 0.400" lift figures. Trying to compare them at every lift will only confuse you (at least it did me).
http://www.purplesagetradingpost.com...fo/heads1.htmlLast edited by techinspector1; 09-05-2008 at 03:50 AM.
PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
A belated Happy 78th Birthday Roger Spears
Belated Happy Birthday