Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: chev 302's back from the dead
          
   
   

Closed Thread
Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 273
  1. #31
    speedy55779's Avatar
    speedy55779 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    saginaw
    Car Year, Make, Model: 41 plymouth, 48 dodge truck
    Posts
    195

    kinda just like they went from a 396 to a 402
    Derek Doble

  2. #32
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    This is true but they used a new L/J block with a cast crank . The 283 blocks had the rear breather port and front oil fill port .

  3. #33
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    You can make a S/J 307 engine out of a 283 block with a S/J 3.25 327 Crank and a set of 307 pistons .

  4. #34
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by speedy55779
    true i over looked that but why would you want to? it would be like putting a 350 crank in a 283 block for example.
    Many performance engines have gone to smaller dia. rod and main sizes.
    An example would be a 434 SBC in a Dart block that has a 350 main size along with a small 1.888 Honda rod journal size.

  5. #35
    speedy55779's Avatar
    speedy55779 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    saginaw
    Car Year, Make, Model: 41 plymouth, 48 dodge truck
    Posts
    195

    Quote Originally Posted by tango
    You can make a S/J 307 engine out of a 283 block with a S/J 3.25 327 Crank and a set of 307 pistons .
    Very true you make a 307 but i'd rather go for putting a 283 small journal crank into a 327 small journal block to make a 302cid. like what they had in the 67 camaros.
    Derek Doble

  6. #36
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    I always liked the larger bore idea more then the stroke to CI one . This is the reason I will not build a 305 for a street / strip set up with its 3.736 bore . But The 305 can be a great street engine and give good MPG .

  7. #37
    speedy55779's Avatar
    speedy55779 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    saginaw
    Car Year, Make, Model: 41 plymouth, 48 dodge truck
    Posts
    195

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    Many performance engines have gone to smaller dia. rod and main sizes.
    An example would be a 434 SBC in a Dart block that has a 350 main size along with a small 1.888 Honda rod journal size.
    434sbc 1.888 honda rod journals japan and american shouldn't mix i can see them offset grinding the rod journals to achieve a longer stroke but what kind of crank are they running?
    Derek Doble

  8. #38
    speedy55779's Avatar
    speedy55779 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    saginaw
    Car Year, Make, Model: 41 plymouth, 48 dodge truck
    Posts
    195

    Quote Originally Posted by tango
    I always liked the larger bore idea more then the stroke to CI one . This is the reason I will not build a 305 for a street / strip set up with its 3.736 bore . But The 305 can be a great street engine and give good MPG .
    i've thought about tinkering with a 283 or 307 for stock car racing to run higher rpms but you can only run a chev 305 olds 307 mopar 318 and a ford 302 all stock and non roller motors or H.O.(high output), but can run a cam with no higher than a 420 lift the most popular cars are 80's montecarlo's with 305's around here once in a while you see someone running an olds 307
    Derek Doble

  9. #39
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    That Mopar 318 is a good runner . I do think I could build a 318 to out power a Chevy 305 .

  10. #40
    hawk56 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    lancaster
    Car Year, Make, Model: 56 Studebaker Golden Hawk
    Posts
    87

    I built a 320 cu small block Chev using a 283 SJ crank in
    a 327 SJ block bored to 4.125 . I did this for a oval track
    class that used a cubic inches to weight rule. I would turn
    it to 8,000 RPM most of the time . The block was from a C50
    truck .
    Dave

  11. #41
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by speedy55779
    434sbc 1.888 honda rod journals japan and american shouldn't mix i can see them offset grinding the rod journals to achieve a longer stroke but what kind of crank are they running?
    It is a Callies crank.
    The rods are Oliver 6.0's.

  12. #42
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    Quote Originally Posted by hawk56
    I built a 320 cu small block Chev using a 283 SJ crank in
    a 327 SJ block bored to 4.125 . I did this for a oval track
    class that used a cubic inches to weight rule. I would turn
    it to 8,000 RPM most of the time . The block was from a C50
    truck .
    Dave
    I see how you made this 320 engine . And it is a COOL build . With a 400 SB Standard bore of 4.126 . The cylinder bore must have been real thin ?

  13. #43
    hawk56 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    lancaster
    Car Year, Make, Model: 56 Studebaker Golden Hawk
    Posts
    87

    Tango
    Yes the walls were thin, the first block did not make it, hit water.
    That is why I mentioned the truck block, thicker walls ? or just plain luck ?
    Dave

  14. #44
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    I do like this build . but with a 400 block . I have built 406 SB Engines They make lot's of power . But they also run hot with that steam hole set up . I really never liked the 383 builds . So I will try another 400 30-over 406 with a good water pump and large radiator . COOL I Hope

  15. #45
    hawk56 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    lancaster
    Car Year, Make, Model: 56 Studebaker Golden Hawk
    Posts
    87

    Tango
    You are right the 400 would have been much easier ,but I built this back in about 1968 , before the 400's were common . I specal ordered the pistons
    before boring the block, so it had to work even if I had to sleeve the block.
    The weight savings on the car by going to 320 CI from 327 CI was 100 lbs
    for oval racing this was a big avantage. Also a steel 39 lb crank and aluminum
    rods. Yes it did run hot , but oval racers never look at guages anyway
    .LOL
    DAve

Closed Thread
Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink