Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: For a 4 Bolt Main Go Stud or Bolt???
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    DaLowRyda is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 Chevy S-10 350ss
    Posts
    8

    For a 4 Bolt Main Go Stud or Bolt???

     



    it sound better for the stud cause it would split the pressures on 2 threads compared to 1...but isnt that just 1 more thing that could come loose and cause a major problem? what does everyone think about this and why it is?

  2. #2
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    stud any time you can, and can afford to do so ( in most cases factory grade 8 hardware will do just fine ), they can retain more clamping force.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  3. #3
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    The thing about studs is, the threads in the block aren't "pulled" as much, since they are threaded in fully before torquing. Also, the studs are usually fine thread on the top bit, so the clamping force is better than coarse thread and they don't tend to loosen up as easy from vibration or whatever. Another plus is that any fatigue from re-use is mainly in the nuts, and they are easily and cheaply replaced. All that said, they are a pain to work with if you don't really need them.

  4. #4
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    I would have no hesitation using studs on the main caps. I'd have to think twice about it on heads though, because normally the driver's side head can't be removed with the motor in the car due to interference with the master cylinder/booster assembly.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  5. #5
    DaLowRyda is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    London
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 Chevy S-10 350ss
    Posts
    8

    so stud it is for a high performance application? i will be pushin 475hp.....obviously ARP.

  6. #6
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    The studs are not twisted like a bolt is, placing it in a combined stress state, that's the real reason studs are better to use structurally. You tend to get a superior clamping result with studs.

    Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink