Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: pistons 3.480 or 3.750
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 24 of 24
  1. #16
    #1firebird's Avatar
    #1firebird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Camas, Valley
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79' Camaro
    Posts
    125

    y do the rods determine the rpm range i thought it was more like heads and cam and intake combo?
    No body messes with the Night Rider

  2. #17
    41willys's Avatar
    41willys is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Coralville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 41 willys coupe
    Posts
    282

    6" rods are WAY overrated especially for street/strip motor. The factory spent millions on engineering the 5.7 rods in a small block. take the money you would have spent on long rods and put into your heads.

  3. #18
    nitrowarrior's Avatar
    nitrowarrior is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Mesa
    Posts
    1,385

    I used to use the Broken 400 cranks for my boat anchors. Too many to count. But that's getting off of the subject this was concerned about. LOL.

  4. #19
    #1firebird's Avatar
    #1firebird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Camas, Valley
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79' Camaro
    Posts
    125

    ????????????????
    No body messes with the Night Rider

  5. #20
    nitrowarrior's Avatar
    nitrowarrior is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Mesa
    Posts
    1,385

    Hey Bird, the post Willy's made about not breaking a crank. That what I was refering to. 400 cranks were prone to split in half under severe conditions. There are proceedures such as naturalizing them to give them the memory they need to withstand the loads and flexing the cylinder pressures and rpms put them through. Just gotta watch which year of production you use. As far as rod length goes, it's always better to go as long as the combo can withstand. I know there will always be arguments about this theory, but think about arm wrestling somebody that's 6ft 5 and you might only stand 5ft 4. Who's got the better geometry? (I know, I know I'm always harping geometry). The pin/skirt load of the pistons are greatly reduced and the rings like not having to succumb to severe change in motion. The pistons will dwell longer at both top and bottom of the stroke travel and this allows you to play in the areas of better combustion and flame travel. These are only a few benefits of going longer rods. Mass isn't as critical for weight purposes because the engine only sees 50% of the upper end and 100% of the bottom end of the piston rod combo. Therefore you have a slight increase in mass and with a well put together assembly, it won't matter.

  6. #21
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    I just thought I would post this again......A book is worth its weight in gold.
    A book I highly recommend is HOW TO BUILD MAX PERFORMANCE SMALL BLOCKS ON A BUDGET ,by David Vizzard .
    This book goes into all the questions you are asking in great detail and it also gives a list of good factory parts to use and ones not to use.With this book you could probably save a couple hundred bucks on your engine and get 100 more hp out of it.... not that I am discouraging you from using the forum , I am trying to better enable you to get the answers you need by being able to ask the right questions.You are asking lots of questions which is good,thats the way to learn.
    This book starts with a regular stock engine and using stock parts and adds power 1 step at a time exsplaining how one part effects another each step of the way,if the book was not so darn useful I would send you my copy
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

  7. #22
    #1firebird's Avatar
    #1firebird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Camas, Valley
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79' Camaro
    Posts
    125

    lol well i did get one of his books from the roseburg library but didnt have it for long, i think ill go and pick it up again.
    No body messes with the Night Rider

  8. #23
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    The one you want is how to build max performance small block chevies on a budgett.........It deals with mostly stock parts....some of the others get into aftermarkett parts pretty quickly and leave out most of the factory parts.
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

  9. #24
    #1firebird's Avatar
    #1firebird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Camas, Valley
    Car Year, Make, Model: 79' Camaro
    Posts
    125

    yeah thats the one i got. but he modified some of the parts and for the cost to mod the parts you could go out and get those parts only a little better for a little higher price
    No body messes with the Night Rider

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink