Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Comp Cam 280 XFI information needed?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25
  1. #1
    sstruck383's Avatar
    sstruck383 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    GSU
    Posts
    32

    Cool Comp Cam 280 XFI information needed?

     



    The Combo:
    -383
    -10.5 compression
    -280 XFI hyd. roller
    -AFR 180cc heads
    -Pro Magnum 1.52s
    -Holley Stealthram MPFI system(non-ported but deburred and polished)
    -700R4
    -3.73s
    -Long tube 1 5/8" headers
    -Intermediate dual 3" mandrel bend pipe
    -Custom Corsa 3" exhaust
    I'll get a 3000 or 3200 stall converter to best suit my needs.

    This is my daily driver for another year so street manners has to be good and of course, must have performance...I will be tuning this personally from the moment it goes in but wanted some information about the camshafts characteristics before I buy it.
    -Comp 280XFI(230/236 with .550 lift w/ 1.52 rockers and 113 lsa)

    What I need to know is:
    1) How is the idle?
    2) Will it pull enough vacuum at 750rpms to run the ABS brakes?

    This is for my 1990 Chevy C1500 2wd truck by the way.....I already have this combo in it for reference.
    Here is the old combo:
    -383
    -9.5 compression
    -218/224 flat tappet
    -AFR 180cc heads
    -Pro Magnum 1.52 rollers
    -Holley StealthRam induction(stock)
    -700R4
    -3.73s
    -Long tube 1 5/8" headers
    -Intermediate dual 3" mandrel bend pipe
    -Custom Corsa 3" exhaust

  2. #2
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by sstruck383
    The Combo:
    -383
    -10.5 compression
    -280 XFI hyd. roller
    -AFR 180cc heads
    -Pro Magnum 1.52s
    -Holley Stealthram MPFI system(non-ported but deburred and polished)
    -700R4
    -3.73s
    -Long tube 1 5/8" headers
    -Intermediate dual 3" mandrel bend pipe
    -Custom Corsa 3" exhaust
    I'll get a 3000 or 3200 stall converter to best suit my needs.

    This is my daily driver for another year so street manners has to be good and of course, must have performance...I will be tuning this personally from the moment it goes in but wanted some information about the camshafts characteristics before I buy it.
    -Comp 280XFI(230/236 with .550 lift w/ 1.52 rockers and 113 lsa)

    What I need to know is:
    1) How is the idle?
    2) Will it pull enough vacuum at 750rpms to run the ABS brakes?

    This is for my 1990 Chevy C1500 2wd truck by the way.....I already have this combo in it for reference.
    Here is the old combo:
    -383
    -9.5 compression
    -218/224 flat tappet
    -AFR 180cc heads
    -Pro Magnum 1.52 rollers
    -Holley StealthRam induction(stock)
    -700R4
    -3.73s
    -Long tube 1 5/8" headers
    -Intermediate dual 3" mandrel bend pipe
    -Custom Corsa 3" exhaust
    I don't think it will even idle at 750 rpm's.
    You don't need a 3,000 to 3,200 stall.
    I would think 2,500 to 2,800 would work well.

  3. #3
    sstruck383's Avatar
    sstruck383 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    GSU
    Posts
    32

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    I don't think it will even idle at 750 rpm's.
    You don't need a 3,000 to 3,200 stall.
    I would think 2,500 to 2,800 would work well.
    Yea, it will idle there after tuning...a few people on the thirdgen.org forums have it and said its not a problem. But, if the 4.8L boys and 5.3L GEN III engine trucks are running 226/226 cams in there trucks are 700rpms, I couldn't see why a 6.2L with a 230/236 with less valve lift would be any harder. 2500 to 2800 would work but the StealthRam is a tunnel ram design and 3000 would be more efficient for my powerband. Yank sells some nice 3000 stalls that acts like a 3400 and drives like stock so I can't complain there.
    Last edited by sstruck383; 03-08-2007 at 06:48 PM.
    1990 Chevy C1500
    Not exactly stock

  4. #4
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by sstruck383
    Yea, it will idle there after tuning...a few people on the thirdgen.org forums have it and said its not a problem. But, if the 4.8L boys and 5.3L GEN III engine trucks are running 226/226 cams in there trucks are 700rpms, I couldn't see why a 6.2L with a 230/236 with less valve lift would be any harder. 2500 to 2800 would work but the StealthRam is a tunnel ram design and 3000 would be more efficient for my powerband. Yank sells some nice 3000 stalls that acts like a 3400 and drives like stock so I can't complain there.
    So if you already think it idles at 750 rpm's why even make a post??
    Choosing a converter has very little to do with intake design.
    So are you saying that if your runner length is a little longer you need to run a higher stall speed??
    You talk about street manners but then you talk about a "nice 3000 stall that acts like a 3400 and drives like stock".
    A 3,400 stall is not going to have nice "street manners" and it will not drive like it is stock,it is going to get hot and you will need to run a very large tranny cooler if this is going to be a "daily driver".
    If I was you I would do a little more research.

  5. #5
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Yup, the higher the stall the more heat it generates. Think I'll stick to manual transmissions and pulling the handle. Having 4, 5, or 6 gears really is nice when it comes to staying in the peak torque or horspower of the engine. IMO an automatic on the street forces a lot of comprimises in the engine build....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  6. #6
    Henry Rifle's Avatar
    Henry Rifle is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Little Elm
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford Low Boy w/ZZ430 Clone
    Posts
    3,890

    Hmmmm. A 3000 stall and a tunnel ram with street manners? A 3000 stall converter acts like a 3400 and drives like stock? Man, I want what some of those folks are drinking.

    Jack
    - I'd put a gear drive on it also . . .
    Last edited by Henry Rifle; 03-09-2007 at 08:12 AM.

  7. #7
    sstruck383's Avatar
    sstruck383 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    GSU
    Posts
    32

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    So if you already think it idles at 750 rpm's why even make a post??
    Choosing a converter has very little to do with intake design.
    So are you saying that if your runner length is a little longer you need to run a higher stall speed??
    You talk about street manners but then you talk about a "nice 3000 stall that acts like a 3400 and drives like stock".
    A 3,400 stall is not going to have nice "street manners" and it will not drive like it is stock,it is going to get hot and you will need to run a very large tranny cooler if this is going to be a "daily driver".
    If I was you I would do a little more research.
    Well, I didn't ask where it would idle but I asked about idle characteristics....mainly vacuum readings b/c of the power brakes and would the cam act/be streetable. Couple of thirdgen.org members run the 230/236 on a 110 lsa and this one has a 113 lsa(which should be better for idle and vacuum), I didn't want to have to have a vacuum assist on the brake system. Obviously, you don't think it would be a good idea. Thanks for your comment but do you have any hard data on the cam to support the answer. If so, share b/c that's what I am wondering about. Yea, I know choosing a converter has nothing to do with the intake but the combination of parts in the engine and if I do this setup a 2500-2800 would work(not saying it wouldn't) but all the converter places have recommended a 3000 or 3200 stall with a 2.3 STR and the setup would be a tight converter so the street manners are good. And by places, I am talking about Yank, Edge, and Vig.

    Henry Rifle-Lots of people with the Yank converters say it acts like a stock converter with a 3000 or 3200 rated stall. However, they say it really flashes to (depending on power, application etc but since I have been talking to trucks guys about it and they are making about the same amount of hp but less torque than me), they all flash to 3400. And also have good street manners. I have a 16" x 9" aux. tranny cooler on it already along with the radiator so should have plenty of cooling for it.

    The 700R4 has a lockup on the 4th gear and an auto came with the truck so, that's what will stay. Stick is funnier to drive no doubt, but the auto will stay.

    The Stealthram is a tunnel ram design by Holley to replace the TPI system from the 85-92 Camaros and 85-88 Corvettes. The power band on my last setup was 2000 rpms to 5300 rpms. I dynoed it when it wasn't tuned and had a nice flat torque curve from 3000 to 4000 rpms. So, with the bigger came, I was looking into 3500 to 4700 torque curve. The Stealthram is very streetable.

    So, just need some information about the cam. Dyno Desktop shows this combination making 512 hp @ 5800 rpms and 526 ft lbs @ 4300 rpms. By using the 800 rpm ruler before peak toruqe....that would be 3500 rpm stall but since the torque curve is flat with the induction system, a 3000 would be fine.
    1990 Chevy C1500
    Not exactly stock

  8. #8
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    You are trying to get in the house thru the basement door ......use the front door. First off forget vaccume readings....a vac boost can is like 50 bucks and you can use any cam you want,Second forget idle quality ,you threw that out the window when you went for 500 hp.
    Match all the components together for your goal and let the idle and vaccume find where they want to be...not where you would like them to be.The idle and vaccume your motor will see is already set by the cam you chose.
    Set a goal and let the goal tell you what parts to buy for the engine.Then match those parts together and let the motor be all it can be.Do not pick a 500 hp winner and then cripple it with trying to get the vaccume up or idle down.
    Sounds like you want a race car in a truck that runs like a stocker.Your goals either need to be idle and vac quality or peak hp.Trying to get tooo many things from one engine will only insure it does none of them well...

    The only way to get what you are telling us you want is fuel injected and supercharged.Idles well ,gets good gas mileage,and has a good vac signal and makes power.A 500 hp carb deal in 383 ci is not going to be friendly to daily driving ....unless 1000 rpm idle and low vaccume and trans coolers everywhere are acceptable and you had better keep lots of tuning tools with ya if the weather changes too much on you while your out!!!
    Now if you were doing 500 hp with 550 cubic inches then this would be a different story.
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

  9. #9
    sstruck383's Avatar
    sstruck383 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    GSU
    Posts
    32

    Quote Originally Posted by shawnlee28
    You are trying to get in the house thru the basement door ......use the front door. First off forget vaccume readings....a vac boost can is like 50 bucks and you can use any cam you want,Second forget idle quality ,you threw that out the window when you went for 500 hp.
    Match all the components together for your goal and let the idle and vaccume find where they want to be...not where you would like them to be.The idle and vaccume your motor will see is already set by the cam you chose.
    Set a goal and let the goal tell you what parts to buy for the engine.Then match those parts together and let the motor be all it can be.Do not pick a 500 hp winner and then cripple it with trying to get the vaccume up or idle down.
    Sounds like you want a race car in a truck that runs like a stocker.Your goals either need to be idle and vac quality or peak hp.Trying to get tooo many things from one engine will only insure it does none of them well...

    The only way to get what you are telling us you want is fuel injected and supercharged.Idles well ,gets good gas mileage,and has a good vac signal and makes power.A 500 hp carb deal in 383 ci is not going to be friendly to daily driving ....unless 1000 rpm idle and low vaccume and trans coolers everywhere are acceptable and you had better keep lots of tuning tools with ya if the weather changes too much on you while your out!!!
    Now if you were doing 500 hp with 550 cubic inches then this would be a different story.
    The Stealthram is a MPFI design....therefore fuel injected. Where did you get a carb from? Never said I wanted it to sound stock, I'm just asking for idle characteristics or cam characteristics for daily driving senerio's of this cam.
    1990 Chevy C1500
    Not exactly stock

  10. #10
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by sstruck383
    Well, I didn't ask where it would idle but I asked about idle characteristics....mainly vacuum readings b/c of the power brakes and would the cam act/be streetable. Couple of thirdgen.org members run the 230/236 on a 110 lsa and this one has a 113 lsa(which should be better for idle and vacuum), I didn't want to have to have a vacuum assist on the brake system. Obviously, you don't think it would be a good idea. Thanks for your comment but do you have any hard data on the cam to support the answer. If so, share b/c that's what I am wondering about. Yea, I know choosing a converter has nothing to do with the intake but the combination of parts in the engine and if I do this setup a 2500-2800 would work(not saying it wouldn't) but all the converter places have recommended a 3000 or 3200 stall with a 2.3 STR and the setup would be a tight converter so the street manners are good. And by places, I am talking about Yank, Edge, and Vig.

    Henry Rifle-Lots of people with the Yank converters say it acts like a stock converter with a 3000 or 3200 rated stall. However, they say it really flashes to (depending on power, application etc but since I have been talking to trucks guys about it and they are making about the same amount of hp but less torque than me), they all flash to 3400. And also have good street manners. I have a 16" x 9" aux. tranny cooler on it already along with the radiator so should have plenty of cooling for it.

    The 700R4 has a lockup on the 4th gear and an auto came with the truck so, that's what will stay. Stick is funnier to drive no doubt, but the auto will stay.

    The Stealthram is a tunnel ram design by Holley to replace the TPI system from the 85-92 Camaros and 85-88 Corvettes. The power band on my last setup was 2000 rpms to 5300 rpms. I dynoed it when it wasn't tuned and had a nice flat torque curve from 3000 to 4000 rpms. So, with the bigger came, I was looking into 3500 to 4700 torque curve. The Stealthram is very streetable.

    So, just need some information about the cam. Dyno Desktop shows this combination making 512 hp @ 5800 rpms and 526 ft lbs @ 4300 rpms. By using the 800 rpm ruler before peak toruqe....that would be 3500 rpm stall but since the torque curve is flat with the induction system, a 3000 would be fine.
    Hard data??
    If you count the fact that I build five engines a week and CNC port about three sets of heads a week and spend about a day and half in the dyno room,Wednesday night at the 1/2 mile dirt track,Friday night at another 1/2 mile dirt track,Saturday morning at the drag-strip,Saturday night at 1/3 mile dirt track.
    I started building engine in 1983 and by 1990 I was building engines for a living.
    You have to be the only person that thinks runner length dictates stall speed.
    If you know so damn much why come on here and ask questions???

  11. #11
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by sstruck383

    So, just need some information about the cam. Dyno Desktop shows this combination making 512 hp @ 5800 rpms and 526 ft lbs @ 4300 rpms. By using the 800 rpm ruler before peak toruqe....that would be 3500 rpm stall but since the torque curve is flat with the induction system, a 3000 would be fine.
    I would have to say that that is one very optimistic virtual dyno reading..... Or did I miss the supercharger or nitrous someplace?
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  12. #12
    sstruck383's Avatar
    sstruck383 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    GSU
    Posts
    32

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    Hard data??
    If you count the fact that I build five engines a week and CNC port about three sets of heads a week and spend about a day and half in the dyno room,Wednesday night at the 1/2 mile dirt track,Friday night at another 1/2 mile dirt track,Saturday morning at the drag-strip,Saturday night at 1/3 mile dirt track.
    I started building engine in 1983 and by 1990 I was building engines for a living.
    You have to be the only person that thinks runner length dictates stall speed.
    If you know so damn much why come on here and ask questions???
    Once again, I didn't say the intake dictates it. Read the reply to your post before you start going off. And two, I didn't know you build engine for a living. I've built a few but I don't know everything, that's why I ask questions. I've been doing research on this combo for about 6 months now. Obvisously, you have more experience then me building engines. My second choice in cams was a 224/230 on a 112 lsa and .510 lift. If you have a better suggestion for a cam, I'm all ears. I'm wasn't trying to bust on you but I would just really appreciate real info on this cam/engine setup. Since you are an engine builder, have you used this cam in a 383? Can you tell me anything about it.

    This was my reply to you if you look up about 3 or 4 post. Yea, I know choosing a converter has nothing to do with the intake but the combination of parts in the engine and if I do this setup a 2500-2800 would work(not saying it wouldn't) but all the converter places have recommended a 3000 or 3200 stall with a 2.3 STR and the setup would be a tight converter so the street manners are good. And by places, I am talking about Yank, Edge, and Vig.
    Last edited by sstruck383; 03-09-2007 at 04:22 PM.
    1990 Chevy C1500
    Not exactly stock

  13. #13
    sstruck383's Avatar
    sstruck383 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    GSU
    Posts
    32

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Severson
    I would have to say that that is one very optimistic virtual dyno reading..... Or did I miss the supercharger or nitrous someplace?
    Yea, I thought so too....no nitrous or charger though. I took it to more of less say, if you have no friction in the engine and everything could go my way, that's what I would get. I'm actually expecting about 475hp....give or take....AFR has done a few dyno on the engine stand with my old cam and went 430hp without the serpentine system.....a thirdgen.org member has almost the same combo and went 397rwhp with the serpentine system. So, who knows, I just want great performance and has decent drivability. MPG wouldn't hurt but its NOT one of my factors building this engine.
    Last edited by sstruck383; 03-09-2007 at 04:20 PM.
    1990 Chevy C1500
    Not exactly stock

  14. #14
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by sstruck383
    Yea, I thought so too....no nitrous or charger though. I took it to more of less say, if you have no friction in the engine and everything could go my way, that's what I would get. I'm actually expecting about 475hp.....a thirdgen.org member has almost the same combo and went 397rwhp.

    I would think 475 would be on the high side, too. I think real world on the engine dyno would probably show it to be in the 425 to 450 range.... Maybe higher, interesting to see the real numbers on a chassis dyno when it's done.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  15. #15
    sstruck383's Avatar
    sstruck383 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    GSU
    Posts
    32

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Severson
    I would think 475 would be on the high side, too. I think real world on the engine dyno would probably show it to be in the 425 to 450 range.... Maybe higher, interesting to see the real numbers on a chassis dyno when it's done.
    Yea, I plan on hitting one up. AFR did a dyno of a 9.5 comp, 180cc heads, 383, and a 218/224 cam and went 430hp and 470 ft lbs. So, figure in a point more of compression and bigger cam, I was guessing 475hp. Do you have a suggestion for a better suited cam....I was thinking of a 224/230 on a 112lsa as a 2nd option.
    1990 Chevy C1500
    Not exactly stock

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink