Results 1 to 15 of 32
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThreaded View
-
02-24-2007 07:36 PM #13
CHR Member/Contributor
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Madison
- Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
- Posts
- 21,160
It may well be too much for FI, I'm certainly no EFI expert... I've always been very satisfied with the Tech guys at Comp, guess I must be lucky.... I would be curious to know the cam specs for the engine.
Guess I'd agree with what Mike said on the dual fours and vacuum secondaries with progressive linkage. A big cam has a tough time idling on a tri-power setup. Bleed holes in the throttle blades on the center carb seems to help a bunch. As for the Barry Grant set up, doubt if it is much different in theory and operation then the old tri-power set ups, just better carbs that are more tuneable. I've ran a couple of Ford FE's with Tri-Powers and one with dual fours. Both at an equal state of tune, IMO the dual fours gave better performance.
No offense meant, but I guess I will continue to place my emphasis on the results on the chassis dyno. I'd much rather go fast then sound fast!!!!!Last edited by Dave Severson; 02-24-2007 at 07:38 PM.
Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
time for a new forum to visit. when they sold sr.com it went down hill fast. no more forum just a cheap site selling junkie cars. the canadians killed hr.com. mods are real pricks. as with any site...
Where is everybody?