Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: horsepower torque
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    rhamm1320 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    24

    I agree with the above the virtual dynos will never get a exact value like a true dyno run, but they have their advantages. I simulated the whole engine in under five minutes to get a good approximation of power output.

    I have put hundreds of engines on a real dynos (SF-800 and SF-901) and it takes hours to get the engine bolted up, started and the run-in. And that doesn't even count the time (and $$$) to change out parts. I can do all this in minutes on a virtual dyno.

    With your combo, the hydraulic camshaft and 650 cfm carb will keep you from crossing the 400hp mark. I was not sure of your lobe seperation, I guessed 108 degrees.
    Attached Images

  2. #2
    viking's Avatar
    viking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Branson area
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T, 53 FLH , 66 C-10 454, 03 CVPI
    Posts
    968

    Pretty large bore there, 406.7ci
    Objects in the mirror are losing

  3. #3
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    Erik, when I type in my ZZ502/502 (unported, stock cam) it matches real darn close.

    My useage has revealed to me that the (even baseline) sims these days ain't that bad. In general I would say within 5%-10% across the board. In most cases less than 5% error from reality.

    Physics is just physiscs after all ......................

    Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

  4. #4
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    Put a set of the new AFR 195 heads and a 750 cfm carb on it and watch it light up! Gobs of power made with a small cam.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink