Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 283 Hp/torque Question
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31
  1. #1
    SC454 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    RUSSELLVILLE
    Posts
    3

    283 Hp/torque Question

     



    need to know amount of hp/torque you can get out of 283 sbc. Is 325 hp attainable. Should i use aluminum heads or cast iron.




    Thank You

  2. #2
    SC454 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    RUSSELLVILLE
    Posts
    3

    I forgot to mention I'm building a 66 chevy pickup and I want a different setup than the typical 350. I also have a 427 but I'm looking to drive the truck as much as I can, so decent gas mileage is a plus. Any help will be nice, I'm not totally sold on the 283.

    Thanks

  3. #3
    chevy 37's Avatar
    chevy 37 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Auburn
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1937 chevy truck& 33 fordtruck
    Posts
    3,017

    The 283 was a great rev engine. With your short 3" stroke you could really wind them out but the heads were small and with the lack of CI you couldn't really build them up. Of course this is my opion but the largest 283 made was for a vette and it was 315HP. Your better off with a 327 or 350.
    Keep smiling, it only hurts when you think it does!

  4. #4
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261

    so that must mean bigger heads is out of the question??????? what i find truly funny is when people give credit to 305 builds but not 283's HA senseless, you have a pm sc454

  5. #5
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    305's are a bit more common engine, 283's are scarce... Some good aluminum heads sized and flowed correctly for the 283 would probably help a lot... As with any short stroke, high winder cam selection and a valve train that will stand up to high rpm's is essential for performance applications. I know, the old parts work, but that's just it, they're old parts..... Take advantage of the new technology and realize even more poential out of the mouse motors.... I like my Blue Oval 289's, too. It's just that I know I can produce more torque and have a much more streetable engine going with a long arm, long rod 408 and have better street manners then I would with a roller cammed, ultra lightweight everything 8500 RPM small cuber....

    Old pickups are heavy, takes torque to move them...... 283's are probably more better suited for lightweight cars with 4 and 5 speed transmissions so you can keep the rev's up and stay in the power band.... Not a put down on small engines, just a fact.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  6. #6
    chevy 37's Avatar
    chevy 37 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Auburn
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1937 chevy truck& 33 fordtruck
    Posts
    3,017

    I run a 305 in my chevy and had it bored out to 315 ci which gives me a better chance of larger heads. What I meant on the 283 was it was and is still a good engine but not one that you could realy build up to the HP you want. I had one in my 56 chevy and I loved it and it was rated at 240HP and I blew the doors off many cars because I could wind it up to 6500rpm with no valve float. I truly loved that motor but went on to better thing like a 348.
    Keep smiling, it only hurts when you think it does!

  7. #7
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by SC454
    need to know amount of hp/torque you can get out of 283 sbc. Is 325 hp attainable. Should i use aluminum heads or cast iron.




    Thank You
    I am not sure I would use the term "torque" when refering to a 283.

  8. #8
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by gassersrule_196
    so that must mean bigger heads is out of the question??????? what i find truly funny is when people give credit to 305 builds but not 283's HA senseless, you have a pm sc454
    Aww come on Scooter, don't hide your answers in a PM. You're among friends here. All of us understand that you have built some very fast 301's and respect you for it.

    SC454, here's the scoop. You can build a 283/301 that will scream, if you want to build horsepower in the upper rpm ranges. In order to get a 283/301 to work, you have to rev it. It's all a matter of passing air through the motor. "X" cubic feet per minute passed through a motor equals "X" horsepower. A larger motor (350/383) will pass the same amount of air at lower rpm's than a smaller motor will at higher rpm's. Now, if you have to run a smaller motor at higher rpm's, then you will also have to cam the motor to run at higher rpm's, which means that you will have to raise the static compression ratio so that the intake closing point on the cam matches the c.r. When you run the longer cam, you have a very soggy bottom end (any cam you choose has an effective operating window of about 3,500 rpm's, so it will be effective, for instance, from idle to about 4,200 rpm's or from 1,500 to 5,000 or from 2,000 to 5,500 or 2,500 to 6,000 or 3,000 to 6,500 or 3,500 to 7,000 or whatever) which means you have to run a very loose converter (if you are running an automatic trans) and a lot of rear gear. A four or five speed trans might be a better choice. With the exception of Scooter and a few others on this forum, most of us would counsel you to start with a larger motor so you could keep the revs down, use a more civilized converter and keep static compression low for use with pump gas. Now, that's not to say you couldn't build a screaming 283/301 to run on pump gas, I'm just saying a larger motor will be a better choice for doing what you want to do.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  9. #9
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    I just ran across this thread on another forum and thought it appropriate to post here......
    http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/buil...evy-57753.html
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  10. #10
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261

    i just felt a bit finicky today!

  11. #11
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    In 1967 I built a .040 over 283 with 'Vette heads and a Duntov cam for my '54 Bel Aire. Good power at high revs, not much bottom end, but 4.11 gears and 14" tires made it work. For a while. When the 3-speed w/overdrive blew, I replaced it with a non-OD trans. The little winder didn't last the summer!
    For what it's worth, I now have a 350 to put in it. 283 was the "hot setup" back when it was pretty much all you could get, but you can't beat cubic inches.

  12. #12
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261

    sure ya can, ya gotta know how to do it

  13. #13
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by gassersrule_196
    sure ya can, ya gotta know how to do it
    Scooter, we know you like your 283, but they do not build large amounts of torque and torque is what it takes to move a heavy car..... Small inches and high revs work good in a light car with a lot of gears and a big number gear in the back. If you really want to have some fun with that mouse, go find a five speed, make fifth gear one to one and 1st about a 2.50 to 1, then run a 4.88 rear gear. Get the car weight down to the 2000 pound range and you can do some serious whooping on the 350's. (go to a 9" rear and I'll let ya run a set of my 6.50's!!!!!)
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  14. #14
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by gassersrule_196
    sure ya can, ya gotta know how to do it
    I can build a 283 that will make good low-end torque I will just bolt on a 150 shot of n20 then it will run about like my 383 engines.

  15. #15
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261

    hasnt anyone ever heard of the 402 stroker kit for 283's ????????

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink