Thread: cast vs aluminum heads
Hybrid View
-
11-07-2006 06:00 AM #1
I have not tried to run 89 octane because I am "on the edge" so to speak of being able to successfully run 92/93 octane. But I built the engine knowing that would be the case. It has a .039 quench area, AFR 190 heads, a CompCams 280 Magnum cam, Edelbrocks RPM intake and 750 carb. I a very satisfied with the performance and its street manners.
Lynn
'32 3W
There's no 12 step program for stupid!
http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson
-
11-07-2006 08:37 AM #2
I also have question on compression. I did a leak down test on my engine and all was good but i was wondering at 180 psi how do i figure out my compression?
-
11-07-2006 08:51 AM #3
You cannot determine compression that way. You have to know things like your head volume in cc's, type of piston, head gasket thickness, and deck height--normally you can assume a stock deck height is about .025. Try going here and using their calculator: http://www.newcovenant.com/speedcraf...ssionratio.htm
Lynn
'32 3W
There's no 12 step program for stupid!
http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson
-
11-07-2006 06:20 PM #4
I.M.O.,a cam with similar duration and lift but with a 106 lobe seperation and would solve your problem.
Originally Posted by rumrumm
-
11-08-2006 06:08 AM #5
Thanks for the post, Erik. You're right about the lobe center, but since I run power brakes, I was concerned about vacuum.
Lynn
'32 3W
There's no 12 step program for stupid!
http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson
-
11-08-2006 07:52 AM #6
Do you have room for an aux. canister?
Originally Posted by rumrumm
-
11-08-2006 08:04 AM #7
No, I don't. There is so little room anywhere inside or under a '32 Ford body that I didn't want to deal with one.
Lynn
'32 3W
There's no 12 step program for stupid!
http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson






LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
I'm happy to see it back up, sure hope it lasts.
Back online