Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 327 Performance options???
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 21 of 21
  1. #16
    sanpedro's Avatar
    sanpedro is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    college station
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 chevy 69 camaro
    Posts
    42

    IT is an 8" balancer. It will be in a 69 camaro, and I plan on putting in a muncie 4 speed
    Attached Images
    Last edited by sanpedro; 10-29-2006 at 04:33 PM.

  2. #17
    sanpedro's Avatar
    sanpedro is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    college station
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 chevy 69 camaro
    Posts
    42

    It only has 8hp in that pic LOL, including the horse in the background

  3. #18
    southerner's Avatar
    southerner is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Auckland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 Holden HT
    Posts
    818

    Thumbs up

     



    Good one ! Those muncie 4 speeds hooked up to the right clutch and flywheel combination will make those 327's sing.

    I recommend a 158 tooth steel flywheel with a diaphagm clutch with the raised fingers 10 1/2 inch diameter. The smaller diameter flywheel will lower the rotational mass of the flywheel which will enable that 327 to rev up quicker. And it wont hurt to get that flywheel lightened some more on the outside edges.

    Is it the wide or close ratio muncie ?
    "aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"

    Enzo Ferrari

  4. #19
    southerner's Avatar
    southerner is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Auckland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 Holden HT
    Posts
    818

    Quote Originally Posted by sanpedro
    It only has 8hp in that pic LOL, including the horse in the background
    And I see the corgi wants to play basketball as well !!!!

    Actually thats not a bad idea using a llawnmowing tractor as a tow vehicle aroud the garage.
    "aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"

    Enzo Ferrari

  5. #20
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by southerner
    Well the heads that he has got on that 327 are going to work a lot better than those open chamber heads that he has got sitting on the workshop floor. And those closed chamber heads produced up to 30 ft lb's of torque right across the engines rev range. If closed chambers are bad howcome world products make closed chamber SR torkers with 68 cc chambers out of cast iron ? Also all the mid sixtys small blocks made some respectable horsepower with closed chamber heads. Then along came 1971, with open chamber heads to drop the compresion ratios to reduce NOX emissions.... "Bang" all the engines right across the board lost up to 30 - 35 HP.
    How come World Products makes 76 cc heads,Pro Topline,AFR etc.
    If money where no object and I had to use stock heads I would rather use a 441 or a 993 and "roll" them over.
    Compression is over rated.
    I would rather see an efficient head with an "open chamber" than an inefficeient head with a closed chamber.
    You take about the mid sixty's.
    In the early 70's what kind of cylinder heads did the Ls6 have on it?

  6. #21
    southerner's Avatar
    southerner is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Auckland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 Holden HT
    Posts
    818

    Have to check on that but I recall that they had the big rectangular port aluminium open chamber heads. Just cannot remember if if the exhaust ports were the O or the D types though.

    It's up to personal choice, a small chamber with a flat top piston and minimal quench works. Flat top pistons are cheaper and there is no piston dome interfering with the flame front. World make open chamber heads along with a plethora of other manufacturers, I am aware of that, but different horses for diferent corses. I only generally use open chamber heads for low compresion engines, like when I put a blower on top of a motor.
    "aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"

    Enzo Ferrari

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink