Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 383 Low rwhp, tq
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 34

Threaded View

  1. #9
    big_G1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hutto
    Posts
    11

    Originally posted by techinspector1
    Well, if you allow 30% loss in the drivetrain, it's makin' 470 at the flexplate. Pull the plugs, wire the throttle blades open and check cylinder pressure. I think I'd have backed off on the intake volume in the heads if I used a cam that made power to 7,500. In my opinion, you've got more heads than cam.
    When I was looking at head flow numbers, the Vic.'s did not flow as well as AFR 190's or 195's. Now I have to decide how to pick up the torque. Smaller runners? Or will a cam with less duration and overlap raise the torque enough to bring the hp. up enough at 6500 rpm? (I don't have to rev. to 7000 rpm). My cranking compression is 150 psi.
    Last edited by big_G1; 12-12-2005 at 07:29 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink