Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 350 Performance
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    350 Performance

     



    My dad wants to get a little over 300 HP out of his 350 in his '72 C10. We got a dyno program ( Dyno 2000 ) and by using stock configurations, with 8.5:1 comp ( my guess of what it is due to the Smog stuff for '72- up ), and with an auto calculated valve lift and valve size, 750 CFM carb ( has a q jet ) it comes out at 190 HP, which looking at the 9.00 comp 1969 350 rated at 255 HP, seems resonable. What are some good things to do W/O a compleate rebuild ( top end rebuild would be acceptable but nothing more ). I figured a set of 64cc heads and a mild cam w/ a set of headders, that seems to do OK on the dyno program which says it is accurate within 7%. Is a electric water pump recomended for street use? My dad saw a electric water pump that is ok to use for street use and it says it frees up 15 horse, I told him I would recomend agenst it but he still thinks it is a good idea, especially being that 15 horse would be eaten up by the extra load on the alt, and having to get an electronic fan because a mech wouldn't work. any suggestions? Thanks in advance
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  2. #2
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Re: 350 Performance

     



    Originally posted by Matt167
    My dad wants to get a little over 300 HP out of his 350 in his '72 C10. We got a dyno program ( Dyno 2000 ) and by using stock configurations, with 8.5:1 comp ( my guess of what it is due to the Smog stuff for '72- up ), and with an auto calculated valve lift and valve size, 750 CFM carb ( has a q jet ) it comes out at 190 HP, which looking at the 9.00 comp 1969 350 rated at 255 HP, seems resonable. What are some good things to do W/O a compleate rebuild ( top end rebuild would be acceptable but nothing more ). I figured a set of 64cc heads and a mild cam w/ a set of headders, that seems to do OK on the dyno program which says it is accurate within 7%. Is a electric water pump recomended for street use? My dad saw a electric water pump that is ok to use for street use and it says it frees up 15 horse, I told him I would recomend agenst it but he still thinks it is a good idea, especially being that 15 horse would be eaten up by the extra load on the alt, and having to get an electronic fan because a mech wouldn't work. any suggestions? Thanks in advance
    I.M.O.,AN ELECTRIC WATER PUMP IS ONLY GOOD FOR DRAG RACING.

  3. #3
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    Re: Re: 350 Performance

     



    Originally posted by erik erikson
    I.M.O.,AN ELECTRIC WATER PUMP IS ONLY GOOD FOR DRAG RACING.
    that's basicly what I told him
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  4. #4
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Re: Re: Re: 350 Performance

     



    Originally posted by Matt167
    that's basicly what I told him
    I THINK A STOCK WATER PUMP WOULD WORK FINE.

  5. #5
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    This one may be what your dad is thinking about and will work on a street motor if you don't mind shelling out 360 bucks for a pump. It actually draws only 9-11 amps. I found out about this only recently on another forum. As all of you know, I've been dead set against electric pumps, but this new technology from Meziere has turned my thinking around. I won't use one, but I will list the source for those who want to.
    http://store.summitracing.com/defaul...h.asp&x=27&y=4
    Click 300 Series.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  6. #6
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Originally posted by techinspector1
    This one may be what your dad is thinking about and will work on a street motor if you don't mind shelling out 360 bucks for a pump. It actually draws only 9-11 amps. I found out about this only recently on another forum. As all of you know, I've been dead set against electric pumps, but this new technology from Meziere has turned my thinking around. I won't use one, but I will list the source for those who want to.
    http://store.summitracing.com/defaul...h.asp&x=27&y=4
    Click 300 Series.
    That is an awsome pump, I have first hand experience with it on the street when it first came out. I sold it a while back and to my knowledge it's still running fine...
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  7. #7
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    360 bucks is a heck of a lot when compared to the price of a good clutch fan!!!!! I've never tried it on a dyno, but I seriously doubt it takes 15 horse to turn a water pump and fan........ JMO
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  8. #8
    dcoffield's Avatar
    dcoffield is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Flint, MI
    Car Year, Make, Model: 88 Caprice /65 Studebaker Commander
    Posts
    85

    Originally posted by Dave Severson
    15 horse to turn a water pump and fan........ JMO
    My guess is that the 15hp number is at really high rpm, where very few street engines run. I would also think that the power required to run the fan/pump is exponential to rpm, so there would be a much lighter load at normal rpm's, and probably very little from stop to the peak power band.
    No matter where you go....there you are!

  9. #9
    staleg's Avatar
    staleg is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford Roadster High Boy
    Posts
    154

    An d if you change to an electric fan, but keep the stock waterpump, I guess the waterpump would need even less horsepower?

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink