Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 305 Valve lift?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    dcurtis's Avatar
    dcurtis is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    :)
    Posts
    84

    305 Valve lift?

     



    Whats the highest recommended lift for stock 305 heads, I'm just trying to get a little more torque out my of a 305 rather than swaping it for a 350
    Last edited by dcurtis; 11-11-2005 at 09:21 AM.

  2. #2
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    If they are Vortec heads, .470 is maximum.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  3. #3
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Thumbs up Re: 305 Valve lift?

     



    Originally posted by dcurtis
    Whats the highest recommended lift for stock 305 heads, I'm just trying to get a little more torque out my of a 305 rather than swaping it for a 350
    HAVE YOU VALVE SPRINGS CHECKED BEFORE YOU GO PUTTING ANOTHER CAM IN IT.

  4. #4
    81 cabellero's Avatar
    81 cabellero is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    delta, BC Canada
    Car Year, Make, Model: 81 gmc cabellero diablo
    Posts
    104

    the biggest cam lobe lift that can safely be handled by stock springs pre 87 are .500......and vortecs less than that.....but on the other hand.....if you are going to run a bigger cam with stock valvetrain i would use nothing bigger than a 216@.050 and a lift of about .450".....reason being, old springs tend to loose their strength with the test of time.....any decent bigger cam would be better with the matching springs.....much safer in the long run....no use putting all you time in a cam swap and then breaking the springs a short time later casue usually when a spring breaks it will also take a lobe out with it......I have seen bigger cams used on stock springs but IMO thats playin with fire.....take your time and do it right the first time.......you will be thankful in the end knowing that your entire valvetrain is matched and will withstand a beating when tested.....hope this helps.
    old habits die hard

  5. #5
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Well, for the umpteenth time, I'll say it again.
    EVERYBODY STARTS ON THE WRONG END OF THE CAR.

    Install a looser converter and numerically higher rear gear and you may find that you don't need more cam. Without changing the converter and gear, your cam change will just move the effective window of operation of the motor higher in the rpm band, away from streetability.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  6. #6
    81 cabellero's Avatar
    81 cabellero is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    delta, BC Canada
    Car Year, Make, Model: 81 gmc cabellero diablo
    Posts
    104

    well.......instead instead of repeating yourself for the umpteenth time, maybe answering each question and then follow with a recommendation will help the person out alot better than having to make the same statement more than once.......so far he has received an answer to his question and with your post a possible gear and convertor change.....for all I know he may have already done a gear and convertor swap.......and is seeking a little more power form the motor.....this person seeking an answer to his question might not have read your 5000+ posts indicating for the umteenth time. Can't presume some of the people asking questions are going to remember all of your posts in the threads....I like to answer the question asked then if i can make a suggestion i will, but i dont presume other parts on the car......
    old habits die hard

  7. #7
    stepside454's Avatar
    stepside454 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Festus
    Car Year, Make, Model: 75 GMC C-15
    Posts
    342

    Curtis , highest lift isnt going to give your 305 more torque.
    75 GMC C-15 factory 454, automatic, lowered

  8. #8
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by stepside454
    Curtis , highest lift isnt going to give your 305 more torque.
    WHY DON'T YOU TAKE A LOOK AT SOME OF THE AFTERMARKET CAMSHAFT'S.WELL WOULD YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THAT MORE LIFT THAN A STOCK CAM.IF YOU WANT TO BUILD TORQUE THE GENERAL IDEA IS OPEN THE VALVE QUICKLY AND THEN SHUT IT QUICKLY THUS BUILDING VELOCITY OF THE FUEL AND AIR CHARGE.I MIGHT OF OVER SIMPLIFIED THINGS LIKE YOU CAN'T HAVE TO FAST A RAMP RATE BECAUSE THE LIFTER WILL DIG INTO THE LOBE BUT I THINK YOU GET THE GENERAL IDEA.
    Last edited by erik erikson; 11-12-2005 at 08:19 PM.

  9. #9
    stepside454's Avatar
    stepside454 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Festus
    Car Year, Make, Model: 75 GMC C-15
    Posts
    342

    maybe more lift...but not the highest lift. Id be more concerned with duration & valve timing than actual valve lift. you can open the valve as far as you want ....but if it doesnt open...& close in a manner that is benefecial to producing torque for this application, it isnt going to do any good
    75 GMC C-15 factory 454, automatic, lowered

  10. #10
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by stepside454
    maybe more lift...but not the highest lift. Id be more concerned with duration & valve timing than actual valve lift. you can open the valve as far as you want ....but if it doesnt open...& close in a manner that is benefecial to producing torque for this application, it isnt going to do any good
    AS LONG AS HE KNOWS THIS HE WILL BE FINE IN MAKING A CAM CHOICE.

  11. #11
    dcurtis's Avatar
    dcurtis is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    :)
    Posts
    84

    I don't need a stall as I plan to use the stock one, I have a turbo 400 tranny with 3.73 posi gears, the 305 is completly stock so all I wanted to do was basically make sure the heads would handle something like a performer carb,intake and cam to help out the lack of torque, I'm not planning on anything outragious just a little more torque. Thanks for your replies

  12. #12
    stepside454's Avatar
    stepside454 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Festus
    Car Year, Make, Model: 75 GMC C-15
    Posts
    342

    curtis, yes itll handle it. as far as the carb goes, Id recomend a 500 cfm
    75 GMC C-15 factory 454, automatic, lowered

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink