Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: edlebrock intake for 87 later heads
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    earn_n_fbody's Avatar
    earn_n_fbody is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    banning
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1982 pontiac firebird
    Posts
    24

    edlebrock intake for 87 later heads

     



    i want to put a rpm airgap manifold on a 87 later heads cast iron. but edlebrock only makes plan performer for 87+ heads.will a rpm airgap for 86 earlier head fit?

    does anyone have experence with the power diference between performer and performer rpm.

    with a 5000 redline will a rpm intake get me more power

    and if the performer rpm for 86 doesnt fit do you guys think if i put a performer for 87 and a 1/2 inch spacer give me about the same results

  2. #2
    robot's Avatar
    robot is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson
    Car Year, Make, Model: 39 Ford Coupe, 32 Ford Roadster
    Posts
    2,334

    Dont forget about getting your car thru smog.....if it is street driven.

    Your best bet is to make a cheap call to Edelbrock and describe what you want to accomplish......their guys know the product.

    mike in tucson

  3. #3
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    The Performer is stated by Edelbrock to make power from idle to about 5,500 rpm's, the Performer RPM from 1,500 to about 6,500. If I were doing it, using a stock converter and limiting the motor to 5,000 rpm's, there's no question that I'd choose a standard Performer. I'd want the higher mixture velocity afforded by the smaller runners of the standard model in order to pack the cylinders better at lower rpm's and give me more power under curve.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink