Thread: 400 sb info!!
-
10-12-2005 05:30 AM #31
no problem, that 2000.00 is good for about .2 in a 3/8 mi. round track.Originally posted by techinspector1
thanks Mike.
Mike
check my home page out!!!
http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
10-12-2005 05:19 PM #32
What does rod length have to do with port volume?Originally posted by dr_bowtie
I would get it I really like the 400....I wouldn't worry about the short rods.....if you open the heads up they really shine....A rod that short realy needs a little larger head but no more than 180cc
-
10-13-2005 07:27 AM #33
There is a balance plate available that goes behind a standard 350 flywheel and smooths out a 400.
-
10-13-2005 07:33 AM #34
i've used one, but when i had my crankshaft checked for bal. he had to add a lot of weight to is.Originally posted by R Pope
There is a balance plate available that goes behind a standard 350 flywheel and smooths out a 400.
Mike
check my home page out!!!
http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html
-
10-13-2005 07:49 AM #35
Just make sure you have the block checked for cranks. 400's are more likely to crack than 350's, and there are inherent weak points. Just because it has low mile does not mean it is free from cracks. If it was me, I would take a risk and go for it.
Lynn
'32 3W
There's no 12 step program for stupid!
http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson
-
10-13-2005 10:50 AM #36
http://www.stahlheaders.com/Lit_Rod%20Length.htmOriginally posted by erik erikson
What does rod length have to do with port volume?
http://victorylibrary.com/mopar/rod-tech-c.htmPLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
10-13-2005 02:28 PM #37
Yes,I understand all that the short rod vs long rod theory.I just would rather see him go to a 5.7 rod or longer to get rid of the extra skirt wear caused by the 5.565 rod.I also would rather see him make a head decision based on having a better rod ratio.Originally posted by techinspector1
http://www.stahlheaders.com/Lit_Rod%20Length.htm
http://victorylibrary.com/mopar/rod-tech-c.htm
-
10-15-2005 07:39 PM #38
i want to do a motor swap in my 91 camaro this winter, lookin for a nice amount of cubes and going for a forged piston for the bottle.... i have a 350 block with most internals bored 30 over, honed and everything...looks brand new..should i put it to use? also payin on a set of world product 202 heads with three angle valve job brand new never been fired on NICE $600....with that said can anybody help me out with a combo??
-
10-15-2005 09:55 PM #39
What's the chamber size of the heads?Originally posted by 91camaro
i want to do a motor swap in my 91 camaro this winter, lookin for a nice amount of cubes and going for a forged piston for the bottle.... i have a 350 block with most internals bored 30 over, honed and everything...looks brand new..should i put it to use? also payin on a set of world product 202 heads with three angle valve job brand new never been fired on NICE $600....with that said can anybody help me out with a combo??
Street motor or what?
Pump gas or race gas?
Loose converter or stock?
Rear gear ratio?
Carb or EFI?
Iron heads?
Budget?PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
10-19-2005 09:18 PM #40
Go for the 400 you will love the extra torque over the 383.(no matter what Eric says)LOL
-
10-20-2005 04:10 AM #41
UMMMM,extra torque over the 383? it has the same stroke as the 400 which is 3.75.Oh,I get it.The extra torque must be found in the .125 larger bore.More rotating mass.L.O.LOriginally posted by 75 TA
Go for the 400 you will love the extra torque over the 383.(no matter what Eric says)LOL





LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
It would be nice if this up and down crap would cease.
Back online