Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 283 question
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 90

Threaded View

  1. #11
    dr_bowtie's Avatar
    dr_bowtie is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Elkhart
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1957 chevy Belair
    Posts
    316

    Scooter.....

    Not to bust a nut here....but, for torque wouldn't you want to go with a smaller rod (5.65)? every test I have done a longer rod in a small motor looses a few low-end torque and gains it every where else....oposite is true otherway around....?

    In theory a longer rod dwells at TDC a little longer so it should absorb more power to relate to the crank....But also slows down piston speed around TDC....notice how I said the same thing twice but differently

    I would build the 283 too....I build and have a truck load full of them.....I think you can do a decent build and knock down more mpg than you would with the 350...I have gotten the best of 26-28mpg in my 57 with 3.73's And I have a 230 duration cam(@.050) w/495 lift flat top's and 64cc double humpers / thin gaskets/ dual plain with a tweeked/reworked spacer....

    Note: Crower make a full line of small journal rods...little heavy for my liking....but you can send em' out for a good ol' lightening..
    Last edited by dr_bowtie; 05-16-2005 at 06:01 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink