Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree50Likes

Thread: 454 build - what intake and cam ?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 97

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    ceejay is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    colombo, Sri Lanka
    Posts
    37

    Ok I will go with new pistons. One of my bores has a rubbed line marked on it so to get rid of that line, I need to bore the engine out to 4.35" or bigger

    I'm not too keen to zero deck the block right now. When the piston is at TDC, the clearance between the top of the piston and the top of the block is only 0.2mm (0.0078")

    I would like to leave that as it is, in case this block has to get decked in the future due to some incident like warping due to over heating or something.

    So I have searched for hours online, and come up with these ICON Premium Forged Pistons IC779-100 -

    Are these an acceptable brand and type of piston for my build ?

    cylinder volume 973.66 (with the new bigger bore size)
    chamber vol 115
    dome vol 18
    gasket vol 10.5 (Fel-pro 1017-1)
    ring land vol 1.1 (from my existing piston)
    clearance vol 1.8 (keeping the 0.2mm deck clearance)

    Compression ratio 9.82:1

    If this is all good, I can finally go ahead and order the parts. Will take several weeks to get to me

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by ceejay View Post
    Ok I will go with new pistons. One of my bores has a rubbed line marked on it so to get rid of that line, I need to bore the engine out to 4.35" or bigger.
    Or hone 7 of them to 4.310" for a +0.060" piston and sleeve the one that's scored, then bore and hone it to 4.310". That would give you a far greater selection of pistons to choose from.


    Quote Originally Posted by ceejay View Post
    I'm not too keen to zero deck the block right now. When the piston is at TDC, the clearance between the top of the piston and the top of the block is only 0.2mm (0.0078")
    Problem with that thinking is that you don't know what the piston compression height is, so you don't know if the pistons you are going to buy will be the same compression height or not. You need to know that right now, and you need to know the block deck height right now.


    Quote Originally Posted by ceejay View Post
    I would like to leave that as it is, in case this block has to get decked in the future due to some incident like warping due to over heating or something.
    Sounds like bogus thinkin' to me, particularly since you have no idea what the piston compression height of your new pistons will be.


    Quote Originally Posted by ceejay View Post
    So I have searched for hours online, and come up with these ICON Premium Forged Pistons IC779-100 -
    Piston compression height is 1.645". Rod length is 6.135" Crank radius is 2.000. Sum is 9.780'. Stock block deck height is 9.800". This leaves the piston down in the bore by 0.020" at TDC. Add the 0.039" gasket thickness and you will have a squish/quench of 0.059", too wide to be effective in controlling detonation with 91 octane fuel and iron heads in my opinion. Measure block deck height and piston compression height right now.


    Quote Originally Posted by ceejay View Post
    Are these an acceptable brand and type of piston for my build ?

    cylinder volume 973.66 (with the new bigger bore size)
    chamber vol 115
    dome vol 18
    gasket vol 10.5 (Fel-pro 1017-1)
    ring land vol 1.1 (from my existing piston)
    clearance vol 1.8 (keeping the 0.2mm deck clearance)

    Compression ratio 9.82:1
    Disregarding ring land volume, which nobody figures, the static compression ratio would be 9.92:1, far too high for 91 pump gas with iron heads. Hone 7 cylinders for +0.060" pistons, sleeve, bore and hone one cylinder for a +0.060" piston, purchase hypereutectic Keith Black KB203KTM+060 for 5/64 rings or hypereutectic Keith Black KB201KTD+060 for 1/16 rings. I'd choose wider rings for a street motor. Cut the block deck height to 9.780" for zero deck and use 1017-1 head gaskets for a 0.039" squish/quench. Now, that's what I'd do and it would result in a 9.44:1 static compression ratio. You do whatever you think is best.

    http://jamisonequipment.com/sites/de...s/BHM-24-1.gif
    Add half the main bearing bore less bearings.

    .
    Last edited by techinspector1; 05-10-2016 at 06:19 AM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink