Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Dual Quads vs Single 4 BBL...
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    bgblk40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: 40 Chevy Master 85 Sedan
    Posts
    64

    Dual Quads vs Single 4 BBL...

     



    .........I'm running a 496", full roller BBC, stroker, in a chopped and twice "Z'ed" '40 Chevy sedan. I love the look of dual quads. Right now I'm running an 800 cfm Edelbrock carb and I don't want to change to something that would decrease my horsepower. I read a few months back an article where a comparison was done between the Edelbrock Airgap single 4 bbl and the dual quad version. The single 4 bbl actually cranked out more horsepower and torque. Go figure.
    Anyway, in order not to lose horsepower I've thought about going with a street tunnel ram setup. I know little about tunnel ram, but I do know you might lose some low end torque over a single 4 bbl. Maybe this wouldn't be too noticeable with a BBC vs SBC? Like I said, I really like the looks of dual quads, but not at the expense of horsepower or less low end torque. What are your thoughts on this? Thanks.


    Tom

  2. #2
    Hombre259's Avatar
    Hombre259 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Out in The Country
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 Chevy 210-57 Chevy 2 dr wagon-48 Ford
    Posts
    375

    I don't know much about dyno's and such as that, Tech or maybe some of the others more versed may speak up. I have been running dual quads on SBC's and BBC's for quite a few years. Not once have a seen a seat of the pants drop in horsepower going with two 4's, and I from my own experiance "think" that I do feel an increase in power. I do run Edelbrock Carbs 600's on the BBC and 500's on the SBC. These carbs are vacuum secondary carbs and draw what the need, in the two sets I am running now the seem to perform very well.

    I am not a fan however of tunnel rams on the street. The are meant to perform at higher RPM's and I just never had any luck with there streetablity.

    Roland
    Protected people will never know or understand the intensity life can be lived at. To do that you must complettly and totally understand the meaning of the word "DUCK"

  3. #3
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,471

    well i ran tunnel rams on the street and only took it off for a blower i have a customer with a tub out 57 chevy pickup that drives it every were with a tunnel ram bbc .with smaller cfm carbs they work at wot you will make more power .i never lost any TQ that i seen or needed. the real ..dyno show more power with a old weiand tunnel ram on my old 572 vs the re work super vic but the single plane pro-filer may do a bit better .has a lot to do with your power band and intake port runner and plenum .. but added carb for some may be added work so if you want the look. it can work my old ram setup has been on over 4 engines not one guy said it did not work
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 04-11-2010 at 06:03 PM.

  4. #4
    vara4's Avatar
    vara4 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1947 International Pick Up
    Posts
    3,134

    I agree with you Pat on them old Weiand intakes I had one on a
    Boss 302 that was port matched, with a 780 holley.
    That thing could realy move.
    Kurt

  5. #5
    TRACK SHY's Avatar
    TRACK SHY is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    CHINO
    Car Year, Make, Model: 73 pro street camaro
    Posts
    21

    I run duel 600 holley vac seconds on a weind tunnel on the street, and it works great. Just cant get by a gas station. The tunnel lags a little on the bottom, but not enough to care about, I tried a rpm performer, with a worked over 780, and it did have a snapier bottom end, and ran well, but didn't hold you in seat like the tunnel does. and at the local car cruises, the tunnel gets more respect. I say run the duels, just for the cool factor. if you like it, you'll make it work. keep smiling T.

  6. #6
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    20,551

    Heck, I know they lose a lot of bottome end. I know they're more hassle then they're worth on the street, I've seen a well tuned single four beat em up on the dyno, and I'm still looking for a pair of 390's to put on a Windsor stroker!!!!! The eyeball appeal and the kewl factor has got to be worth something. Besides, I run a 5 speed and can twist the snot out of it and make it work on the street, too!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  7. #7
    cffisher's Avatar
    cffisher is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Constantine
    Car Year, Make, Model: 57 chevy 2 dr wagon /73 Nova hatchback
    Posts
    9,002

    Yea buddy 2x4 is the only way I like to go
    Attached Images
    Last edited by cffisher; 08-11-2010 at 08:58 AM.
    Charlie
    Lovin' what I do and doing what I love
    Some guys can fix broken NO ONE can fix STUPID
    W8AMR
    http://fishertrains94.webs.com/
    Christian in training

  8. #8
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,471

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Severson View Post
    Heck, I know they lose a lot of bottome end. I know they're more hassle then they're worth on the street, I've seen a well tuned single four beat em up on the dyno, and I'm still looking for a pair of 390's to put on a Windsor stroker!!!!! The eyeball appeal and the kewl factor has got to be worth something. Besides, I run a 5 speed and can twist the snot out of it and make it work on the street, too!!!!
    well not not much low end to loose . when you have a big sumof a$ ich .as of the dyno well let s say the 572 like s two 4500 holleys and yes smaller engine you have to twist the snots out of it ...but he as a 496

  9. #9
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is online now CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    4,923

    thats a very restricted intake scoop

  10. #10
    HOSS429's Avatar
    HOSS429 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New Market
    Car Year, Make, Model: 73 pinto -80 pinto- 69 mustang 429
    Posts
    2,197

    something has changed !!! i cant post a picture
    iv`e used up all my sick days at work .. can i call in dead ?

  11. #11
    green34ford's Avatar
    green34ford is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dixie
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1934 Ford Truck
    Posts
    360

    yea can't beat the dual quad wow factor

  12. #12
    DONNIE G's Avatar
    DONNIE G is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    sparwood
    Car Year, Make, Model: 29 plymouth,28 stude dictator,37 chev
    Posts
    146

    wow factor?

     



    three duces beat a pair anytime, cept for a blower!

  13. #13
    bgblk40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: 40 Chevy Master 85 Sedan
    Posts
    64

    Quote Originally Posted by DONNIE G View Post
    three duces beat a pair anytime, cept for a blower!

    I like 3 deuces...on a small block. Don't look right on a BBC. JMHO.


    Tom

  14. #14
    hotrodstude is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    pendergrass
    Car Year, Make, Model: 2006,ford,f-150,v-6,5-speed manual
    Posts
    245

    i've run 2x4s on the street for a long time.i recomend carter/edelbrock cars over holleys for the street.on my 428 ford i run the carbs backwards they just seem to work better that way.but on the buick(425 super wildcat nailhead installed in a 56 chevy w/4-speed)i ran them the way they came from the factory.facing toward the front of the car.on the street the carters are better and also you set them once and forget them.to show you how long its been when the edelbrocks came out i had retire from the auto business have never touched one.but i have heard both good and bad about them,one day i'll buy one but i have a stack of afbs in the shead.

  15. #15
    Hot Rod Todd is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Christchurch
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T bucket, 26 t Coupe, 37 Nash Sedan,
    Posts
    446

    Tom,

    Just man up and get a polished 871 will you!

    You get the wow factory and another couple of hundred foot lbs of torque. Its what the TV people call a win-win situation.

    Come on, you know you want to

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink