Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Street compression ratio w/pump gas
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    ekitch is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Car Year, Make, Model: 70 Stingray
    Posts
    25

    Unhappy Street compression ratio w/pump gas

     



    Hi again u guys,
    I put my 540 project off since last year, now I am getting interested in it again.
    I have a bowtie gen 6 block zero decked, and a 540 balanced rotating assembly consisting of an 4340 eagle crank, 1 pc int balance, h-beam rods, and SRP small 10cc dome pistons.
    I wanted to run factory iron heads to make the motor look stock, found a nice LS6 pair on ebay awhile back, they are casting number 3994026. They intake volume on these heads is approx. 320-325 cc's. I cc'd the chambers and found approx. 114 cc. Stock they are 118cc, so it looks like they've been shaved. If I assemble the motor now, the static compression comes in high at 10.7:1.

    At this point I think I can either change out the pistons to flat tops and rebalance the rotating assembly, fly cut the tops off the existing pistons and rebalance the rotating assembly or just get different heads with a bigger chamber. Any suggestions. I am leaning toward a gm factory iron head engine, since it's going in a '70 vette.

    So now this leads me to wonder just what is a good target compression ratio for this size engine that's been zero decked and has iron heads?
    Thanks for your help, Ed

  2. #2
    mooneye777's Avatar
    mooneye777 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    dayton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1948 ford anglia
    Posts
    978

    Are you asking if 10.7-1 compression is too high for pump gas, If so its not too high for premium 93 octane pump gas. You are safe to about 11.5-1, being safe, or even a bit higher 12-1 with an iron headed motor on premium pump gas. The 12-1 is pushing your luck with the fuel and with the use of iron heads.


    Live everyday like it were your last, someday it will be.

  3. #3
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    well you can open up the head chambers on the old heads or buy world iron heads that flow better then yours and would have a bigger chamber or run a bigger cc head gasket then you do not have to screw with the bottom end 10.5 is ok with good pump would have a lot to do with were your at with dynamic CR with your cam
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  4. #4
    ekitch is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Car Year, Make, Model: 70 Stingray
    Posts
    25

    Yes, I thought about opening up the chambers a bit. The question is, how much can they be hogged out and would it be even worth all this effort, I don't know..?
    I would like to stick to gm heads if possible.
    Thanks

  5. #5
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by ekitch
    Yes, I thought about opening up the chambers a bit. The question is, how much can they be hogged out and would it be even worth all this effort, I don't know..?
    I would like to stick to gm heads if possible.
    Thanks
    well i would not use the word hogged out they can be open up to the head gasket bore size .and re work around the ex side you can pick up some CC how many ?? 118 cc or more
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  6. #6
    shooterpcb is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Dothan
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 Chevelle SS396
    Posts
    16

    over 11:1 you will have to start looking at duration dwell to bleed of pressure and you will lose bottom end performance.12:1 is definitely gonna put a hurt on the octane requirements. 10.5:1 is ideal for a street performance big block and not have to worry about higher than 93 with a good street performance cam.
    1969 Chevelle SS396
    1969 El Camino
    '04 Silverado 5.3 ex cab

  7. #7
    ekitch is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Car Year, Make, Model: 70 Stingray
    Posts
    25

    Well I am going to try and keep it at around 10:1 due to only 91 octane availability here in CA. It used to be 92 octane when gas was only $1.50 a gallon, maybe 8-10 years ago. Now there is talk they may just eliminate the 91 octane too. I would have to use some kind of octane booster if they did that..

  8. #8
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    I owned a '68 427 Vette, oval port closed chamber heads, 11.36:1 measured volumetric CR. Had to have 50% race gas with 50% 93 octane. Also if you lighten up the front end a tad your weight distribution will improve and so will your handling. Aluminum heads will also get you further away from detonation issues. JMO.

    Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

  9. #9
    ekitch is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Car Year, Make, Model: 70 Stingray
    Posts
    25

    Quote Originally Posted by kitz
    I owned a '68 427 Vette, oval port closed chamber heads, 11.36:1 measured volumetric CR. Had to have 50% race gas with 50% 93 octane. Also if you lighten up the front end a tad your weight distribution will improve and so will your handling. Aluminum heads will also get you further away from detonation issues. JMO.

    Kitz
    Thanks Kitz, I have decided to go with aluminum heads after all. There are just too many advantages to pass up. I just had the iron LS6 heads magged and cleaned, no cracks they are ready for a build up and are for sale...have pics so make offer if anyone is interested. They are stock for a 1971 LS6 Chevelle.
    I have heard that dart heads will fit the car with hooker super comp headers with there raised 0.300 exhaust ports. I don't want to hack up those nice headers or build custom ones. And with the new darts larger chamber, 121 cc, that will give me an exact 10:1 CR. The other option is the edelbrocks, they will work too.

  10. #10
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    That sounds real good to me .................

    Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink