Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 781 vs 049 heads
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    AdamB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    reading
    Posts
    74

    781 vs 049 heads

     



    I have a 1991 marine 454 in my 26' boat. I am looking to do some performance mods as indicated in my other posts. If I change to some beter OEM type heads, which would be better heads to go with? Or is there a better marine head I should go with.

    I need low end torque, but still would like to rev to around 5500 rpms or so. Stock marine 454 has 330 hp, and I would like to bump that up. I eventually want to do a 496 stroker kit also, so these new heads would have to work with that as well. I would probably run a 850 Holley double pumper

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    1JohnnyO is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Hagaman
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 Chevelle SS, 67 Camaro
    Posts
    404

    Well Adam, if you're asking whether these (049 or 781) heads are good for what you want, the answer is yes....The 781's will be a little easier to find, but one is the same as the other, identical castings (for all practical purposes anyway) With bigger valves, (or even stock valves) and a little work, they will easily support a 5500 rpm engine, and if you go with the larger valves, will work nicely on your future 496. Those castings are considered my many to be one of GM's best 'as cast' production heads. John
    When your dreams turn to dust, Vacuum!

  3. #3
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    o49 have a set. if you can not find any they are bone stock can be set up for roller cam and big valves i you are not building any thing bigger than a 454 then stock SS valves will be ok

  4. #4
    1JohnnyO is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Hagaman
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 Chevelle SS, 67 Camaro
    Posts
    404

    Mr. McCarthy, always tryin to make a buck!!!
    When your dreams turn to dust, Vacuum!

  5. #5
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by 1JohnnyO
    Mr. McCarthy, always tryin to make a buck!!!
    well i am so sorry i can only work four hours a day with my health you try living on that kind of income
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 11-29-2006 at 03:37 PM.

  6. #6
    AdamB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    reading
    Posts
    74

    Okay, I thought they were pretty much the same castings, but weren't sure. Seems the 049's were going for more money for some reason. How much hp gain would I see on a stock 454 with 049 heads? Enough hp to make it worth it like 30 or 40 or?

  7. #7
    AdamB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    reading
    Posts
    74

    Pat, sent you a PM I think.... asking about your 049's.

  8. #8
    1JohnnyO is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Hagaman
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 Chevelle SS, 67 Camaro
    Posts
    404

    well i am so sorry i can only work four hours a day with my health you try living on that kind of income
    Pat, Im only kidding!!! You know that, right??


    Adam, the 049's were only made for one year, I believe...73 I think, so there are not so many of them out there, that drives the price up. Im not sure what you mean by the rest of your question...those WERE stock heads on a 454, as were the 781's...so any horsepower increases would have to come from installing larger valves, port work, etc. Pat would know better than I would, what kind of increases would come from that sort of work. I do know that they are very good heads to work with.
    When your dreams turn to dust, Vacuum!

  9. #9
    AdamB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    reading
    Posts
    74

    I have small peanut heads now, so going to a bigger head would allow more air flow correct? Even stock head design....

  10. #10
    1JohnnyO is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Hagaman
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 Chevelle SS, 67 Camaro
    Posts
    404

    Are you positive you have the peanut port heads?? What's the casting numbers on them. Yes, a better head will flow more, but that larger flow is generally only needed at the higher rpms. The peanut port heads are actually not bad for low to mid rpm performance, lots of torque. I dont know that they would be good for extended runs at 5500 rpms however. Post the numbers for us.
    When your dreams turn to dust, Vacuum!

  11. #11
    AdamB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    reading
    Posts
    74

    I went to remove a valve cover and saw that I have to remove an exhaust manifold first. Uggg, it's never simple.
    Attached Images

  12. #12
    1JohnnyO is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Hagaman
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 Chevelle SS, 67 Camaro
    Posts
    404

    Holy cow!!! Sell the boat, buy a car!
    When your dreams turn to dust, Vacuum!

  13. #13
    AdamB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    reading
    Posts
    74

    Okay, I think the # is 14092360

  14. #14
    1JohnnyO is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Hagaman
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 Chevelle SS, 67 Camaro
    Posts
    404

    Yep, you're right, that's the peanut ports. Well, if you go with the 049's or 781's, you'll be fine.
    When your dreams turn to dust, Vacuum!

  15. #15
    AdamB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    reading
    Posts
    74

    Okay, thanks. Now to find some cheap ones

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink