Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Cams choice
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    30-A Rider is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Santa Rosa Beach
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66Chevelle SS; 70 Chevelle Conv.
    Posts
    150

    Cams choice

     



    As some of you know Im in the process (for the better part of 2 years, nickel and diming here and there) of building a big block 454 .030 over for my 66 Chevelle. I have spoken with quite a few people on here and always appretiate the individual help..Thanks much gentlemen. My lower end is done with a stock crank, stock rods, with upgraded rod bolts. Pistons are forged Ls6 repro's yeilding 9.75-10:1 compression. Im utilizing a set of 781 heads with street strip porting with larger stainless valves. Most likely a high rise dual plane intake, 750-850 or so cfm vaccuum sec carb, 2500-3000 stall convertor on a th400 trans and a 350-373 gear on 27-28" tall tire( carb, convertor and rear not determined yet). I am guessing when I say the car is approx 3700-3800 lbs with driver. Car will not be a daily driver, mostly street; occasional strip use, but need to have some street manners and run cool in Florida traffic.

    So I was leaning heavily towards a hydraulic roller, but with flat tappet hydraulic Im already anticipating a 450-525 hp/ft lb motor.... without tubbing the car, so traction I would guess is already gonna be a feat. The added $ and hp of the hydraulic roller is just not necessary I think for what Im trying to achieve, so Im leaning towards hydraulic flat tappet.

    So here is where it gets frustrating yet funny. Below I will list all of the cam recomendations I have obtained over the past 9 months or so. Funny thing is I give the same description to all whether they ask for it or not, yet some of these cams are quite a bit different from each other.

    Please do comment! Comment on the ones you dont like, the ones you like or by all means suggest something different. Any input is much aprretiated by all experienced people on here. Thanks again to many on here who have increased my knowledge and taken time to reply before (Pat Mc, Johnny O, Tech etc etc)

  2. #2
    30-A Rider is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Santa Rosa Beach
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66Chevelle SS; 70 Chevelle Conv.
    Posts
    150

    Competition Cams (284 XE) (tech guy Robin)
    240/246@ .050 574/578 110 LSA
    3,000 convertor stall
    AND/OR
    234/244@.050 564/571 111 LSA


    Crane Cams
    226/236@ .050 534/553 112 LSA
    2500 stall
    AND/OR
    236/246@.050 553/571 110 LSA


    Howards Cams (tech Scott)
    230/230@ .050 .514/.514 110LSA


    Competition Products (recomended this howards cam)
    228/236@.050 595/602 110LSA
    3000 stall


    Jegs (recomedned this XE274 Comp Cam)
    230/236@ .050 552/555 (didnt give lsa)


    Crower Cams
    229/237@ .050 525/545 LSA 110


    Lunati (voodoo cam)
    241/249 @.050 572/590 LSA 110

    AND/OR

    240/245@.050 612/612 LSA 112
    (both 2800-3200 stall)


    Finally one of our experienced memebers recomended this Howards cam
    234/240@.050 540/540 LSA 110

    Now One I would like to throw out with my limited experience is the Lunati Voodoo cam
    233/241@.050 551/572 LSA 110

    Sp after talking to all of these companies, the person who made the most sense to me on cam choice was one of our members choice Howard cam. Regardless being a guy who just has not grasped and fully understands cam dynamics (I think beyond reading you have to have practical application experience, in several motors) I think most can see how frustrating this can be. I of course want to make a good choice/ and correect choice first time around. So, again please do comment, as they are all appretiated.

  3. #3
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    The majority of them are close enough on numbers that you would have to have them on a dyno to see the power differences. IMO, from dynoing a bunch of different combinations I doubt you would see more than 10 horse difference. On a street set up, no tubs, no slicks I would probably choose the mildest and hope it doesn't overpower the chassis and tires......
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  4. #4
    hambiskit is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Shelton
    Posts
    693

    I run a Howards cam in my race car, and most the guy's running sprints up here are running them too. I've never gotten a bad cam or advise from them.
    Jim

  5. #5
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    i spent some time with you. but i can not say for sure what i told you to run. but one thing you have to know or you will find out the hard way them big lift cam on small lsa will hit the pistons . have been there may times

  6. #6
    hambiskit is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Shelton
    Posts
    693

    Yes they will, you will have to cut the relief's in the pistons.
    Jim

  7. #7
    30-A Rider is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Santa Rosa Beach
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66Chevelle SS; 70 Chevelle Conv.
    Posts
    150

    Wow Pat and Hambiskit,

    Something I did not know or understand. Considering the hydraulic roller I was gonna go with why would this cam not hit which has higher lift than the flat tappet?

    How can I determine what cam lift is gonna work without hitting the valves? And if I have to have valve reliefs cut into the pistons, how does one determine the depth?

  8. #8
    flanker1970 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    palm beach gardens
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1972 monte carlo 402
    Posts
    157

    a friend of mine has the crane 226/236. It is an excellent grind with a great sound and works well with power brakes. It may be a bit small for your application though.

  9. #9
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Originally posted by 30-A Rider
    Wow Pat and Hambiskit,

    Something I did not know or understand. Considering the hydraulic roller I was gonna go with why would this cam not hit which has higher lift than the flat tappet?

    How can I determine what cam lift is gonna work without hitting the valves? And if I have to have valve reliefs cut into the pistons, how does one determine the depth?
    lift is lift roller or hyd flat. there is way to many thing that can hang you .like were is the valves in the head ? this is called drop heigth this may be very different now the heads have bigger valves . how much was cut off the heads? is the block O deck? and like i said the lsa has alot to do with this to and dura . there is no easy answer this is were you have to check all the valves on both sides of the engine

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink