Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 6-71 or 8-71?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Bernesto is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Toledo
    Posts
    2

    Question 6-71 or 8-71?

     



    I am getting ready to make the jump and put a blower on my 454. I have done a great deal of research on selecting which would be best size (6-71 or 8-71) for my application but can't seem to find any definitive answers. The motor is already a torque monster (Edelbrock performer package) built for bottom-end power (idle to 5500) but 470 lb/ft just isn't enough! I understand the advantages of both, i.e.
    the 6-71 makes more boost at a lower engine RPM but the 8-71 produces less heat for the same amount of boost (on the same size motor). Does anyone have any real-world experience they can share? Also, I plan on running dual Edelbrock Performer 750's (AFBs) any thoughts on these carbs as opposed to running Holleys? Thanks in advance!

  2. #2
    DynoDon is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Tulsa
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 Chevy Pick-up
    Posts
    99

    I assume that you already have the compression at a blower friendly level & want to run pump gas. Detonation is going to be your biggest enemy with a blower & keeping the air charge as cool as possible will help avoid detonation. The 8-71 will make about the same boost 10% underdriven as the 6-71 will running straight up on a 454... so, less heat. Lots of folks like the Edelbrock carbs, but the Holley or Demon carbs are (IMO) are best suited for blowers. Other things that help keep the heat down would be aluminum heads, running straight water (no anti-freeze) BIG aluminum radiator & dual electric fans, high flow mechanical water pump, engine oil cooler & keeping the timing advance down. There are several other members here that have quite a bit of blower experience, perhaps they will have a few other suggestions.

  3. #3
    deepnhock's Avatar
    deepnhock is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Brooklet
    Car Year, Make, Model: '37 Stude Coupe Express
    Posts
    218

    If you stuff an 8-71 on there, you won't be able to use a stock location distributor...
    Except for looks, why would you want an 8-71?
    Sheesh, you hot rodder guys
    Jeff
    http://community.webshots.com/user/deepnhock

  4. #4
    J. Robinson's Avatar
    J. Robinson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Titusville, FL
    Car Year, Make, Model: 31 Ford Coupe; 32 Ford 3-window
    Posts
    1,783

    Since you guys are on the subject of blowers, may be you can clear up something I have been curious about for years. Can someone tell me what the numbers mean? I know they were originally produced to use on GMC diesels. I've seen them range from 3-71 to 18-71. Obviously, the first number relates somehow to physical size, but how? Why do they all end with 71?
    Jim

    Racing! - Because football, basketball, baseball, and golf require only ONE BALL!

  5. #5
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    GM diesels were rated by number of cylinders and cubic inches per cylinder, a 6-71 had 6 cylinders of 71 cubes each.

  6. #6
    DynoDon is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Tulsa
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 Chevy Pick-up
    Posts
    99

    Originally posted by deepnhock
    If you stuff an 8-71 on there, you won't be able to use a stock location distributor...
    Except for looks, why would you want an 8-71?
    Sheesh, you hot rodder guys
    Jeff
    An MSD distributor works fine. The 8-71 just doesn't have to work as hard as the 6-71( less RPM's for the same amount of boost) MORE POWER UHH..UHH..UHH

  7. #7
    MAW
    MAW is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Huntington Beach
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1937 Dodge Pickup, 354 Hemi
    Posts
    137

    6-71 vs 8-71

     



    I've had both on my boat motors and can't say I could tell the difference with the same boost levels.

    I'm not sure if the 8-71 will produce less heat than the 6-71 at the same boost level. It's the compression of the air that creates the temperature rise and the required horsepower drain from the crank, although there might be a few second order effects like windage and frictional losses involved. You'd probably need a dyno to see these slight differences though.

    The Littlefield blower I'm running on my present boat came from a friend who replaced it with a brand new 8-71 from Summit. After $3500 and 2lbs more boost his boat ran the same speed.

    If you're running oval port heads on your 454 the 6-71 will produce more flow than your heads can accomodate. You can end up building big boost numbers in the manifold plenum, but not making any additional power.

    As stated the first number indicates the number of cylinders, the second the displacement of a single cylinder (and the engine series). Two stroke Detroit Diesels were offered in 53, 71, 92, and (I believe 121) Series. The 53 Series blowers were the basis for the small B&M blowers.

    Regards, Mark

  8. #8
    van454's Avatar
    van454 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car Year, Make, Model: 78 HZ Holden Panelvan
    Posts
    4

    Gee some people are greedy!!!
    Oh well I guess you can never have too much Horsepower.
    No Replacement for Displacement

  9. #9
    Superjim427's Avatar
    Superjim427 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Cleveland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 chevy chevelle
    Posts
    61

    would putting a 177 blower with a single 750cfm edelbrock carb on a 427 chevy be dumb or would a 671 be better i was thinking of hiding it under my 6 inch cowl hood

  10. #10
    76GMC1500 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,176

    Originally posted by J. Robinson
    Since you guys are on the subject of blowers, may be you can clear up something I have been curious about for years. Can someone tell me what the numbers mean? I know they were originally produced to use on GMC diesels. I've seen them range from 3-71 to 18-71. Obviously, the first number relates somehow to physical size, but how? Why do they all end with 71?
    But what about blowers like the 14-71? GMC never made a 14 cylinder as far as I'm aware. What about the 92 series, GMC never made a 8-92 blower. It's probably just a 12-71 blower, but why don't they call it an 8-92? For the 16v92, they just bolted 2 8v92 blocks together, made a 16 cylidner crank, and installed everything on one bedplate. That one just used 2 of everything from the 8v92 including the superchargers.

  11. #11
    lt1s10's Avatar
    lt1s10 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    rustburg,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1997 CHEVY.S10 LT1-350
    Posts
    4,093

    about the carb. i ended up runing the Edelbrocks, because on a hot day the gas in the holly would boil over from the blower heat and with the Edelbrocks i didnt have that problem. i ran holly, Edelbrocks and predators. the predators did better at the drag strip. i used the 6-71, didnt see no need for a 8-71 on the st. had more power than i needed anyway. what ever you do just keep it simple and you'll have more fun.
    Mike
    check my home page out!!!
    http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html




  12. #12
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    "But what about blowers like the 14-71?"

    The 14-71 as used in Top Fuel and Funny Car is a purpose-built aftermarket design. Here are the spec limits:
    Case length max. 22 1/4"
    Case width max. 11 1/4"
    Rotor length max. 19"
    Rotor diameter max. 5.840" including fixed stripping
    The case must be one piece with removeable front and rear bearing end plates. Rotor must be contained within one-piece case. Inlet/outlet cavity restricted to max. one inch, measuring from the face of the bearing plate to the back of the cavity.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  13. #13
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Originally posted by J. Robinson
    Since you guys are on the subject of blowers, may be you can clear up something I have been curious about for years. Can someone tell me what the numbers mean? I know they were originally produced to use on GMC diesels. I've seen them range from 3-71 to 18-71. Obviously, the first number relates somehow to physical size, but how? Why do they all end with 71?
    Actually, they don't all end with 71. GMC made other motors with blowers.

    53.. 2.3.4.V6.V8.V12..
    71.. 2.3.4.4Twin.6.6Twin.6Quad.8V.12V.12VTwin.16V.16VTwin
    92.. 6V.8V.12V.16V..
    110.. 6.6Twin..
    149.. 12V.16V..
    add to those Turbo .. Turbo intercooled .. Turbo aftercooled .. Turbo intercooled aftercooled ..
    those are documented but may be a few others not certain if there was a 171, and there were some V71 Twins and Quads.. inline had High and Low blocks..
    there were also V53 and 671 alloy block versions
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  14. #14
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Re: 6-71 or 8-71?

     



    Originally posted by Bernesto
    I am getting ready to make the jump and put a blower on my 454. I have done a great deal of research on selecting which would be best size (6-71 or 8-71) for my application but can't seem to find any definitive answers. The motor is already a torque monster (Edelbrock performer package) built for bottom-end power (idle to 5500) but 470 lb/ft just isn't enough! I understand the advantages of both, i.e.
    the 6-71 makes more boost at a lower engine RPM but the 8-71 produces less heat for the same amount of boost (on the same size motor). Does anyone have any real-world experience they can share? Also, I plan on running dual Edelbrock Performer 750's (AFBs) any thoughts on these carbs as opposed to running Holleys? Thanks in advance!
    I assume you've checked out all the blowers available???.....
    http://streetmachinesoftablerock.com...topic.php?t=81
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink