Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Give your opinion on this BB build
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Duke901 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sylvania
    Posts
    41

    Give your opinion on this BB build

     



    454 block 60 over

    427 crank

    7/16 rods

    arias dome top pistons 11.5

    comp EX284H 574-578 lift 240-246 duration

    781 heads, 2.19 intake and 1.88 exhaust

    comp rockers,push rods,lifters,guide plates,retainers,seals,springs

    RPM air gap intake

    Edelbrock 750 #1411

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    My opinion? 11.5:1 c.r. will need more cam.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  3. #3
    viking's Avatar
    viking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Branson area
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T, 53 FLH , 66 C-10 454, 03 CVPI
    Posts
    968

    Good flat torque curve, around 450 from 2000-5000
    HP 172@ 2000 peaks 432@ 5500, this was assuming hly lifters, large tube headers through free flow mufflers, per desk top dyno.

    As tech said, needs more cam.
    Objects in the mirror are losing

  4. #4
    dr_bowtie's Avatar
    dr_bowtie is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Elkhart
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1957 chevy Belair
    Posts
    316

    Personally those numbers fall a little short I think......?

  5. #5
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    If the input is correct, the desktop dyno is usually + or - about 5% of what the done engine on the dyno actually turns out. Real world numbers are usually a lot lower than "advertised" numbers. As I said on another post, seen a lot of "600 horse motors" that couldn't get a chassis dyno to register more than 300 !!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  6. #6
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    why not put a 454 crank in it?? you will have more cubes this is 468 and get it to 12to1 and run a roller cam 680 680 lift 269/279 at 0.50 on 108 do some bowl work on the heads plug that in your deck top dyo who the hell cares about HP what keeps you nailed in the seat isTORQUE

  7. #7
    viking's Avatar
    viking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Branson area
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T, 53 FLH , 66 C-10 454, 03 CVPI
    Posts
    968

    Originally posted by Dave Severson
    If the input is correct, the desktop dyno is usually + or - about 5% of what the done engine on the dyno actually turns out. Real world numbers are usually a lot lower than "advertised" numbers. As I said on another post, seen a lot of "600 horse motors" that couldn't get a chassis dyno to register more than 300 !!!!!

    Your right on track there Dave, and I've checked DTD against some magazine builds with there specks, all were within 3-4%

    Hey dr_bowtie, got that spark plug out of the mini van yet ?

    And Pat, I wondered the same but figured he wanted the shorter stroke.
    Last edited by viking; 05-18-2005 at 08:54 PM.
    Objects in the mirror are losing

  8. #8
    Duke901 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sylvania
    Posts
    41

    I would have went with a 454 but I bought the short block already together. I know with 11.5 I will need to run race fuel but with the cam I only have a 2800 stall, so thats why I went alittle smaller. Plus I still want to run my power brakes. What cam would you recommend? I want to stay hydraulic flat tappet.

  9. #9
    TravisB's Avatar
    TravisB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NW Arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1962 ChevyII,1964 MalibuSS,1966 Chevelle
    Posts
    118

    Originally posted by techinspector1
    My opinion? 11.5:1 c.r. will need more cam.
    my thoughts exactly!!!

  10. #10
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Power brakes?????

    Young man, I don't know who's been advising you or what you've been reading, but you're way on the other side of reality. I thought when you first posted, you had a bracket racing motor in mind. If you're planning to run this combination on the street, you may not know it, but you're just about knee deep into a nightmare. You're planning your whole build around 11.5 pistons and it's gonna cost you like you won't believe. You'll have to use a cam that makes power from about 3,500 to 7,000 rpm's, so that will mean a new 3,500-4,000 converter and some stiff gears if you don't have them already. You'll need to set aside some time to change valve springs regularly. You'll need a high-rise single plane intake and minimum 850 carb and with the price of racing gas, I'd say you'd be approaching an operating cost, just for fuel, of about $1.00 per mile.

    My best advice to you would be to disassemble the short block and sell the Arias pistons on ebay, then purchase pistons which will give you a c.r. of 9.0 to 9.5:1 so you can run pump gas and use your existing converter.

    If you're not familiar with how to figure c.r., read this paper I wrote:
    http://streetmachinesoftablerock.com...opic.php?t=124
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  11. #11
    dr_bowtie's Avatar
    dr_bowtie is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Elkhart
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1957 chevy Belair
    Posts
    316

    Viking.....

    Hell No....I have found plug won't turn if it is cold (left overnight)

    But, If I get the engine hotter than snot it'll turn a little ....atleast..more than cold just not enough to come out....

    going for the tourch....just gotta remove the exhaust and O2 sensor to get to it.....Very funny....

  12. #12
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    427 0.60 over this is not to good of a comb power brakes ??? you were going to run this street strip ??put more cam in or take the piston s out. is this some thing you are driving every day? if so take out the pistons if not put a bigger cam in it and get it up to 12 to 5 race gas is the same for 11to1 or 12to5 and forget the power brakes think i would sell all of it or the mass and make a496 or 468 you can make a pump gas monster with the 781 heads and not spend big $$ on gas

  13. #13
    Duke901 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sylvania
    Posts
    41

    I dont want this as a daily driver or anything, I just want to beable to drive it around if I have to. Like to cruises and other shows. I can always get a vacuum canister for the brakes and a bigger stall and rear gears. So with that what cam would you recommend, Do you think I should stay with a hydraulic or go with a solid cam.

  14. #14
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    i am not a big fan of flat lifters cams in big blocks i like rollers here are some numers howards cam 620/635 294/302 236/242 112 lobe sep and 612/612 296/302 236 /242 on 112this is a good cams for a hydraulic roller mechanical roller 645/645 285/285 244/244/ no110 665/679 282/290 248/254 on110

  15. #15
    Duke901 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sylvania
    Posts
    41

    how much would it cost to swap to a roller set up.

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink