Thread: c6 behind a 351w??
Results 1 to 4 of 4
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks-
11-14-2005 11:55 AM #1
CHR Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- midland
- Car Year, Make, Model: 91 ford mustang
- Posts
- 14
c6 tranny behind a 351w
i am building a mustang and i aquired a c6 tranny, how much of a disadvantage will this be as opposed to a c4 or something? anyone with answers will be greatly appreciated.
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
11-14-2005 03:49 PM #2
CHR Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Eston
- Posts
- 2,270
Disadvantage how? The C6 is a much better trans, just heavier, if that's a consideration. The C4 doesn't have enough flow to the cooler for serious power applications.
-
11-15-2005 05:21 AM #3
CHR Member/Contributor
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Madison
- Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
- Posts
- 21,160
I agree with the Pope..... I have a C-6 behind the 351W in my '71, no way would I trade it for a C-4. The 6's are a lot stronger tranny and should last a lot longer on the street than a comparably prepped C-4.Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
11-18-2005 06:48 AM #4
CHR Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- midland
- Car Year, Make, Model: 91 ford mustang
- Posts
- 14
c6 behind a 351w??
i was just wondering if there would be any disadvantage to using a c6 behind a 351w. other than weight is there any other diff. between the c6 and c4?
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Shine's done a lot more hot rod & muscle car builds than me, but I've found an adjustable PV to be helpful in balancing front to back braking. All OEM vehicles use a non-adjustable proportioning...
Time for brakes