Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree8Likes
  • 2 Post By Chicken Legs
  • 1 Post By falconvan
  • 2 Post By rspears
  • 1 Post By 34_40
  • 1 Post By rspears
  • 1 Post By Chicken Legs

Thread: 1960 Ford Ranch Wagon - Crown Vic suspension/Coyote 5.0 engine swap
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Chicken Legs is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Birmingham
    Car Year, Make, Model: 28 Model A Hupmobile
    Posts
    98

    1960 Ford Ranch Wagon - Crown Vic suspension/Coyote 5.0 engine swap

     



    I'm in the process of building a 60 Ranch Wagon. Plans are to make the suspension/drivetrain more modern. I've sourced a Crown Vic front end that I plan to narrow and use a Mustang II rack when complete. This should have a difference of 5" narrower. I also plan on using a Coyote 5.0 motor and manual trans.

    I've heard the 60 front suspension won Nascar, however that was 60 years ago. Having to source a disk brake conversion and different springs has me thinking the Crown Vic is better for the money. Plus I can set my ride height super low if wanted.

    Any suggestions before going down this rabbit hole?

  2. #2
    falconvan's Avatar
    falconvan is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    festus
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 Plymouth, 48,54 Heap
    Posts
    3,407

    Nice; sounds like a good cruiser.
    Dave Severson likes this.
    1 Corinthians 1:27

  3. #3
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    10,988

    I'm pretty sure that it was the Starliner top that won NASCAR for them! I was just reading a piece about how Ford's top profile change in '62 took them out of the running, to the end that they tried a trick move to qualify another profile - https://macsmotorcitygarage.com/ford...KhO4dr9EvUME_w

    The Crown Vic's became the vehicle of choice for law enforcement for many years, and they were great cruisers. Seems to me that your swap should be a good one! Looking forward to seeing your progress, if you plan to start a build log.... And a Ranch Wagon!! Super Cool!
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  4. #4
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,606

    Quote Originally Posted by Chicken Legs View Post
    I'm in the process of building a 60 Ranch Wagon. Plans are to make the suspension/drivetrain more modern. I've sourced a Crown Vic front end that I plan to narrow and use a Mustang II rack when complete. This should have a difference of 5" narrower. I also plan on using a Coyote 5.0 motor and manual trans.

    I've heard the 60 front suspension won Nascar, however that was 60 years ago. Having to source a disk brake conversion and different springs has me thinking the Crown Vic is better for the money. Plus I can set my ride height super low if wanted.

    Any suggestions before going down this rabbit hole?
    Having recently helped a friend with a conversion to a crown vic front end in a 53 F-100, I'd say use everything you can out of the Vicki. Suspension / Steering / Motor & mounts.... all good stuff. Only thing I didn't care for was the wheel selection. You have to run the offset to what I'd consider unsightly. But he likes it and that's all that matters.
    Dave Severson likes this.

  5. #5
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    10,988

    Quote Originally Posted by 34_40 View Post
    Having recently helped a friend with a conversion to a crown vic front end in a 53 F-100, I'd say use everything you can out of the Vicki. Suspension / Steering / Motor & mounts.... all good stuff. Only thing I didn't care for was the wheel selection. You have to run the offset to what I'd consider unsightly. But he likes it and that's all that matters.
    Since he's narrowing the Crown Vic front end, can't he set the width to run the offset/backspace that he wants?
    40FordDeluxe likes this.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  6. #6
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,606

    Quote Originally Posted by rspears View Post
    Since he's narrowing the Crown Vic front end, can't he set the width to run the offset/backspace that he wants?
    I'd assume so. Not sure what numbers he's dealing with. Narrowing by an inch.... you could probably still use all the stock suspension parts, just change the adjusters for the steering by a few turns of the threads.

  7. #7
    Chicken Legs is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Birmingham
    Car Year, Make, Model: 28 Model A Hupmobile
    Posts
    98

    Quote Originally Posted by 34_40 View Post
    I'd assume so. Not sure what numbers he's dealing with. Narrowing by an inch.... you could probably still use all the stock suspension parts, just change the adjusters for the steering by a few turns of the threads.
    With the wheels mounted on the stock Ranch Wagon then the Crown Vic, the CV is 8" wider. The rack from a Mustang II is 5" narrower than the CV. Im hoping this would cure the wheel selection issue. It will affect the sway bar. Maybe that will be the only issue.
    34_40 likes this.

  8. #8
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    10,988

    Quote Originally Posted by Chicken Legs View Post
    With the wheels mounted on the stock Ranch Wagon then the Crown Vic, the CV is 8" wider. The rack from a Mustang II is 5" narrower than the CV. Im hoping this would cure the wheel selection issue. It will affect the sway bar. Maybe that will be the only issue.
    Thinking that narrowing ~8" is going to affect the Ackerman angle and can cause some funky steering response. You may have to heat & bend your spindle arms a bit to fix it, but that's not too tough. Sounds like you've thought it through for a good plan.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  9. #9
    Chicken Legs is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Birmingham
    Car Year, Make, Model: 28 Model A Hupmobile
    Posts
    98

    Quote Originally Posted by rspears View Post
    Thinking that narrowing ~8" is going to affect the Ackerman angle and can cause some funky steering response. You may have to heat & bend your spindle arms a bit to fix it, but that's not too tough. Sounds like you've thought it through for a good plan.
    Whats the ideal angle with Ackerman?

  10. #10
    rspears's Avatar
    rspears is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner, KS
    Car Year, Make, Model: '33 HiBoy Coupe, '32 HiBoy Roadster
    Posts
    10,988

    [
    Quote Originally Posted by Chicken Legs View Post
    Whats the ideal angle with Ackerman?
    Ackermann steering is what sets the angle of the front wheels for no scrub/slip, outside wheel at a different angle than the inside wheel. I took a picture of the diagram in Pete & Jakes catalog that describes the process. You'd use the line through the upper & lower ball joint instead of the kingpin location, through the tie rod ends to the center of the rear axle. Racers/Drifters play with the Ackermann angle to change their handling, especially circle track guys.
    Attached Images
    Last edited by rspears; 04-05-2023 at 06:01 AM.
    Roger
    Enjoy the little things in life, and you may look back one day and realize that they were really the BIG things.

  11. #11
    40FordDeluxe's Avatar
    40FordDeluxe is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Prairie City
    Car Year, Make, Model: 40 Ford Deluxe, 68 Corvette, 72&76 K30
    Posts
    7,264
    Blog Entries
    1

    This sounds like an awesome build. I've seen guys use off set tie rods or ream the tie rod holes from the bottom and install the tie rods on the bottom of the spindles if they were on top to help with the Ackerman angle. I've seen builds before with the CV fronts narrowed but I didn't hear how well they drove after.
    Ryan
    1940 Ford Deluxe Tudor 354 Hemi 46RH Electric Blue w/multi-color flames, Ford 9" Residing in multiple pieces
    1968 Corvette Coupe 5.9 Cummins Drag Car 11.43@130mph No stall leaving the line with 1250 rpm's and poor 2.2 60'
    1972 Chevy K30 Longhorn P-pumped 24v Compound Turbos 47RH Just another money pit
    1971 Camaro RS 5.3 BTR Stage 3 cam, SuperT10
    Tire Sizes

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink