Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree6Likes

Thread: 350 chev vs. 400 chev
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28
  1. #1
    racemaster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    albuquerque
    Posts
    33

    350 chev vs. 400 chev

     



    I recently came into posession of a '77 chev 400 motor, small block,looks to be in good shape, can anyone tell me briefly the pros and cons of using this motor instead of a 350?

  2. #2
    jerry clayton's Avatar
    jerry clayton is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bartlett
    Posts
    6,831

    needs external balanced flywheel/harmonic dampner-------if its complete engine everything compatibal---mounts, exhaust, accessories

  3. #3
    racemaster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    albuquerque
    Posts
    33

    I have the truck, so it is all there. Flywheel is cracked but that can be replaced easy enough. (motor/trans already removed) I was asking in terms of reliability and what kind of cost comparisons in improving on power. I know most parts are interchangeable but I would think the 350 would have less expensive parts inside as the 350 was produced in much larger quantities. On the other hand I have heard(and read) both good and bad things about the 400. Also, in checking prices it seems the 400's cost quite a bit more if one was to buy a complete motor.

  4. #4
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Price of what parts? Doubt there's enough difference in 350 and 400 internals to even make it a consideration. 400 has a longer stroker and makes more torque, probably better for a stock type rebuild for a truck. I'd have to suggest you consider which would provide you the best engine for your application rather then just counting the pennies.......
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  5. #5
    Rrumbler is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Car Year, Make, Model: Sans hot rod, sold the truck.
    Posts
    1,207

    Some folks don't put much stock in the 400 because of the siamesed cylinder walls, claim they cause heating problems, and the external balance bothers some; the heads are also different, have some extra steam venting holes in them that the 350 heads don't, and it has been said that the 400 heads are prone to cracking. That said, I never had any problems with the 400s I had in my trucks, and I worked them pretty hard; in my experience they are good engines, and given the choice, I would take a 400 over a 350; appropriately massaged, they will make excellent power and be dependable doing it.
    NTFDAY likes this.
    Rrumbler, Aka: Hey you, "Old School", Hairy, and other unsavory monickers.

    Twistin' and bangin' on stuff for about sixty or so years; beat up and busted, but not entirely dead - yet.

  6. #6
    halftanked is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Liberty
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1929 ford
    Posts
    504

    400's are horrible,and as a real pal,I'll offer to sacrifice myself by letting you give it to me. I'll put up with drilling steam holes to swap in 350 heads and the horror of using reduced base circle cams to clear the crank. Hank

  7. #7
    racemaster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    albuquerque
    Posts
    33

    Reduced base circle cams? By that you mean there are special cams for the 400? I have a retro-fit roller cam for a 350, but if I cant use it then the price of improvement just went up. I have read of cracking problems with the stock heads but I also have some good 350 heads, should I put them on instead? How about you stop beating around the bush?

  8. #8
    racemaster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    albuquerque
    Posts
    33

    Hey Pat, can you give me the real story on the 400?

  9. #9
    racemaster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    albuquerque
    Posts
    33

    If I didnt have to count pennies I'd be drivin a Ferrari

  10. #10
    halftanked is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Liberty
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1929 ford
    Posts
    504

    Check with your cam manufacturer to see if the one you already have will work in a 400. I used early 327 heads and just drilled the steam holes myself. You may not want to increase the compression that much. Quite a few late seventies chevy heads were prone to cracking not just on 400's. Hank

  11. #11
    HOSS429's Avatar
    HOSS429 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New Market
    Posts
    2,584

    Quote Originally Posted by halftanked View Post
    Check with your cam manufacturer to see if the one you already have will work in a 400. I used early 327 heads and just drilled the steam holes myself. You may not want to increase the compression that much. Quite a few late seventies chevy heads were prone to cracking not just on 400's. Hank
    and he didn`t beat around the bush ,,,
    iv`e used up all my sick days at work .. can i call in dead ?

  12. #12
    slincoln 3 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ocean City
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 LTD,76 Cordoba,71 Mark iii
    Posts
    86

    Cool

     



    I always thought it was inferior to 350. I always heard just like 400 Mopar is inferior to 383,400 Ford inferior to 390,360 Mopar inferior to 340. I' can't verify 350- 400 but the others are all true lol. That I can verify!!
    Last edited by slincoln 3; 10-06-2014 at 01:48 PM.
    It is our wits that make us men!!!!

  13. #13
    34_40's Avatar
    34_40 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New Bedford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford 3W Coupe Replica
    Posts
    14,624

    Comparing a 400 Ford to a 390 Ford is light comparing an apple to an orange! They are 2 different engine designs / families.. The 400, known as a Modified, and the 390 known as the FE. Completely different designs and intended uses.

    The 340 / 360 comparison.. I've never heard anyone ever say a 360 was inferior to a 340!

    Perhaps it's a regional thing?

  14. #14
    slincoln 3 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ocean City
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 LTD,76 Cordoba,71 Mark iii
    Posts
    86

    I meant when I was looking to buy a late 60's early 70's Ford everybody said make sure you get a late 60's cuz 390 is a lot more durable and has more horsepower. Same when I was looking for a Duster everybody said get a 340 their a lot hotter. That's what I meant not internals and such. We on the same page now?
    Oh apples and oranges are both fruit ,round and grow on trees close enough. Its not like comparing an orange to a basketball lol.
    Last edited by slincoln 3; 10-06-2014 at 07:56 PM.
    It is our wits that make us men!!!!

  15. #15
    slincoln 3 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ocean City
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 LTD,76 Cordoba,71 Mark iii
    Posts
    86

    If you were raised in a Mopar family like I was you would hear the 383-400 340-360 comparisons often and 400 and 360 would always coome up short. More cubic inches less horsepower does not weigh heavily in their favor...

    That is not true that the 390-400 came in different cars with different intentions. IT replaced 390 in all cars LTD,Galaxie,Montego,Marquis etc... I won't go on but it was all of them rest assured.
    Last edited by slincoln 3; 10-06-2014 at 04:23 PM.
    It is our wits that make us men!!!!

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink