Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Just an update
          
   
   

Results 1 to 15 of 16

Threaded View

  1. #7
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    "I would love to hear what you all think."

    You want to hear what I think? OK, here goes....

    1. I think anyone who has to dump their ride down on the frame to get attention and thinks it's cool has a screw loose in their brain and is an unthinking victim of "monkey see, monkey do".

    2. I think anyone who has to camber the tire in like that to get the frame on the ground doesn't have a firm grasp of engineering principles. It just looks max goofy to me.

    3. I think the front outside rubber is going to roll under on turns in normal driving due to lack of camber gain on bump. The upper control arms are laid flat on the frame rails side to side in front view.

    4. I think that because the upper and lower control arms are parallel to each other in a side view, that there can be no instant center and therefore no anti-dive on braking built into the suspension.

    5. I think I would rather not have my truck built this way.
    Last edited by techinspector1; 01-28-2009 at 10:25 AM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink