Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Wrong geometry on all Mustang II?
          
   
   

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Threaded View

  1. #2
    Henry Rifle's Avatar
    Henry Rifle is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Little Elm
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford Low Boy w/ZZ430 Clone
    Posts
    3,890

    In my opinion, this TYPE setup is better - simply because it uses both upper and lower A-Frames instead of the MII lower strut. However, there are MII versions out there using A-Frames all around, good geometry, including anti-dive built in. Interesting that this builder claims accurate Ackerman, since that is dependent on wheelbase. He can't get it exactly right without knowing the wheelbase of your car.

    I have no problem with MII setups. My '30 A-bone drove just fine with one. Parts are plentiful, there are dozens of versions (coil-over, airbag, etc.) and they're generally lighter than the mid-size car versions.
    Last edited by Henry Rifle; 11-09-2004 at 08:56 AM.
    Jack

    Gone to Texas

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink