Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

View Poll Results: which engine

Voters
42. You may not vote on this poll
  • 496

    11 26.19%
  • 540

    3 7.14%
  • 355

    15 35.71%
  • 406

    13 30.95%

Thread: A poll for the Chevy guys, and others too.
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    A poll for the Chevy guys, and others too.

     



    Ok, the old 'maro has got to go. One of the threads I did on it was about the color, with all the helpful information given by all of you the car will be painted Resale Red. It's time for me to start lining up some engine parts and I'm curious what the opinions are as to a powerplant for the car..... So, which combination is going to offer the best return on the dollar?


    1. Big Block with a stroker kit taking it to 496 inches and a 400 hydro. Reworked oval port cast iron heads....

    2. 540 inch Big Block, solid roller cam, aluminum heads, and all the other go fast goodies and a well built 400 hydro with hi stall converter

    3. 355 small block, GM heads, hydraulic cam, 350 hydro with a shift kit.

    4. Stroker small block (383 or 406), solid roller cam, aluminum heads, 400 hydro, hi stall converter and all the other go fast stuff



    A bit of other info about the car....It will have coilover suspension, triangulated 4 bar, tubular A-Arms, 9" Ford rear, 6 point roll bar, frame ties, strut tower braces, a ton of body mods, 4 wheel disc brakes, dash full of Autometer gauges, and a bunch of trick stuff all over.... Weight will come in at around 3,000 pounds dry....
    Last edited by Dave Severson; 05-06-2008 at 04:19 PM.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  2. #2
    Geezer2's Avatar
    Geezer2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Dunedin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1976 Cadillac Seville with 454 Chevy
    Posts
    421

    Unless you find an absolute HP nut the basic 355 SB will give you the best ROI in the engine room.

    Plus, they're cheap to put together/
    Buying parts I don't need, with money I don't have, to impress people I don't like

  3. #3
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    I agree. I don't think you could recover the additional money spent to go the big block route. If there was a $10,000 difference it might make sense, but I don't see that happening. I think the other components will be the big money bringers.

    Don

  4. #4
    Don Shillady's Avatar
    Don Shillady is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Ashland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 29 fendered roadster
    Posts
    2,160

    Dave, Just my two cents, but the turbo 350 may not be a good seller with the high price of gas. An OD trans might be a good selling point, AND they tend to have a lower ratio first gear than the T350 so you get economy for cruising on the Interstate AND a strong first gear/

    Don Shillady
    Retired Scientist/teen rodder

  5. #5
    moparme's Avatar
    moparme is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Reisterstown
    Car Year, Make, Model: '48 Plym.Cpe / '34 Plym.5window coupe
    Posts
    30

    Quote Originally Posted by Itoldyouso
    I agree. I don't think you could recover the additional money spent to go the big block route. If there was a $10,000 difference it might make sense, but I don't see that happening. I think the other components will be the big money bringers.

    Don
    I'm with Geezer & Don, 355. Reliable as hell. People buy the complete package anyway. Won't get what you want after you spent tons in the motor. Keep it simple and fast. My 2c.
    Bryan

  6. #6
    brickman's Avatar
    brickman is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    west plains
    Car Year, Make, Model: '48 chev Stylemaster
    Posts
    1,390

    My 2 cents, Resale red needs something with a soul to get the money, ok just won't bring it. I think that it needs a heart, the BB stroker will be very streetable but yet have enough grunt to "raise a wallet" right out of the pockets.
    There are a million out there with stock drive trains, yours isn't stock so IMHO the engine shouldn't be either.
    "Sunshine, a street rod and a winding beautiful Ozarks road is truely Bliss!"

  7. #7
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    what about a Twin turbo 350? that would appeal to a lot of people as the word Turbo usually does.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  8. #8
    BigTruckDriver is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    TX
    Car Year, Make, Model: hotrod
    Posts
    1,830

    Can you post a pic to maybe get a idea of what it looks like? I think a pic of it will give a better feel of what it is/needs. If its looking plain than just the basic 355 should be fine. If its looking like a beast might want to set it off with some thing more "killer". Just my 2 cents. With the suspension youve added it can handle all the above.
    Last edited by BigTruckDriver; 05-06-2008 at 08:41 PM.
    Friends dont let friends drive fords!

  9. #9
    viking's Avatar
    viking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Branson area
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T, 53 FLH , 66 C-10 454, 03 CVPI
    Posts
    968

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt167
    what about a Twin turbo 350? that would appeal to a lot of people as the word Turbo usually does.

    Hmmmmmm................
    Attached Images
    Objects in the mirror are losing

  10. #10
    Stu Cool's Avatar
    Stu Cool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Olivehurst, CA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '53 Studebaker Custom w/LS1
    Posts
    1,900

    Dave, You know where my mindset on motors has gone lately. I would get either an LS2 or a 6.0 from a late model GM truck or SUV. Put either an OD automatic or a T-56 6 speed in it. You would have a car that could be scary fast and still be drivable and get decent fuel mileage. These LS conversions have become bolt ins now with kits from folks like BRP hotrods: http://www.brphotrods.com/. This is the way of the future. Even if you don't like the EFI, now there are numerous options to use a carb with these new motors. For the money you would spend on a stroker big block you could easily do the LS. Best of both worlds!

    Pat
    Last edited by Stu Cool; 05-07-2008 at 05:59 AM.
    Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong!

  11. #11
    falconvan's Avatar
    falconvan is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    festus
    Car Year, Make, Model: 48 Plymouth, 48,54 Heap
    Posts
    3,407

    Quote Originally Posted by Stu Cool
    Dave, You know where my mindset on motors has gone lately. I would get either an LS2 or a 6.0 from a late model GM truck or SUV. Put either an OD automatic or a T-56 6 speed in it. You would have a car that could be scary fast and still be drivable and get decent fuel mileage. These LS conversions have become bolt ins now with kits from folks like BRP hotrods: BRP Muscle Rods Your LS1 - LSX Conversion Kit Specialist. This is the way of the future. Even if you don't like the EFI, now there are numerous options to use a carb with these new motors. For the money you would spend on a stroker big block you could easily do the LS. Best of both worlds!

    Pat
    This would be my vote, Dave. The Gen III and IV series engines are way ahead of the older engines in design and potential. They already have all the stuff we used to spend big speed buck on like aluminum heads and roller cams; plus they have 6 bolt mains to boot. No contest.

  12. #12
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by falconvan
    This would be my vote, Dave. The Gen III and IV series engines are way ahead of the older engines in design and potential. They already have all the stuff we used to spend big speed buck on like aluminum heads and roller cams; plus they have 6 bolt mains to boot. No contest.
    well there is a contest they just do not drop in older cars it will cost money/time to hook at all up they can run and run better in stock form then the older sbc they are $$ to hook it all up. a bbc 496 is the best bang for the buck NO ALUM needed and not much more then headers cam and intake
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  13. #13
    bigjon 454's Avatar
    bigjon 454 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Westland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 70 Elky 454
    Posts
    59

    I agree with all but the FOMOCO statement

     



    Hard to beat the roi of a BBC vs mouse, and the Elky did just cost 80. to fill up the other day. But it is only for cruising, and well many SBC at my cruise in may beat me, none of them have that big cube sound, trip every car alarm in the parking lot, or cause people to run out of the bldg when I start it up. I'm reliving my teenage years, while trying to hook my 13 year old on old is good.......still. But certainly not for daily driving, thats what the Yukon is for.
    1970 El camino,454!!

  14. #14
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    I would have to say #4

  15. #15
    halftanked is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Liberty
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1929 ford
    Posts
    504

    I think I have to agree with Pat. Cheap gas isn't going to come back. A stock 6.0 makes nice power and will yield better mpg than any of the choices you mentioned. Hank

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink