Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 
Like Tree15Likes

Thread: 500 hp/550 lb-ft from a 390?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 68

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Jeff Perkins is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Conyers
    Car Year, Make, Model: 67 Mustang Coupe
    Posts
    26

    Scat rods are on order and should be in soon.

    Tech,
    I just wanted to ensure that I'm on the same page here, the pistons that you mentioned are Speed-Pro's with a 4.070 bore (at least that's how I read it) and a .030 overbore was mentioned initially so wouldn't that require a 4.080 piston? If that's the case, I don't see that size readily available from Summit. I haven't had the machine shop check bore sizing yet but my initial measurements with the ol' Mitutoyo caliper shows that it might just be possible to get there from here. I've looked and a couple of companies make forged pistons in .030 over but the price is pretty steep. I really like the idea of forged pistons so I'd like to keep it that way....I realize that .010 isn't that great a change but I would value your thoughts on power production with that difference. Assuming I've got the math right anyway...

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    +0.030 is usually the first thing that pops out of my mind on these builds because a block will almost always clean up at 0.030", where it may or may not clean up at 0.020". I much prefer less cut on the cylinder walls, thinking that the walls should be left as thick as possible. In my opinion, the small amount of additional power gleaned from another 0.010" cut doesn't justify the thinner walls.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink